Let’s get the easy thing out of the way first: Georgia’s defensive red zone conversion percentage for the 2016 regular season stunk on ice, no ifs, ands or buts about it. It was also a stunning drop from its third-place national finish from the season before.
The question I’ve got is how much does that matter to Smart and Tucker? I’m not being facetious. Check out Alabama’s national ranking in that stat over the past few seasons:
- 2016: 40th
- 2015: 63rd
- 2014: 74th
- 2013: 4th
- 2012: 3rd
- 2011: 1st
- 2010: 3rd
- 2009: 3rd
It sure seemed important for a while, but it’s almost like Saban’s lost interest lately (which, admittedly, is still a long way from finishing 127th out of 128 teams).
But look at where the Tide ranks in red zone attempts defended over that same period.
- 2016: 1st
- 2015: 2nd
- 2014: 49th
- 2013: 1st
- 2012: 3rd
- 2011: 1st
- 2010: 7th
- 2009: 1st
Now that’s consistent excellence there.
What’s Georgia’s story?
- 2016: 26th
- 2015: 7th
- 2014: 30th
- 2013: 73rd
- 2012: 54th
- 2011: 21st
- 2010: 35th
- 2009: 70th
Okay, that’s not as abysmal as next to last, but it’s pretty mediocre.
I joke about the Auburn game that the key to keeping Auburn from scoring regularly from the red zone was to keep Malzahn’s offense out of the red zone, but that’s actually how things played out in Georgia’s most impressive defensive effort of the year.
The trick to that, though, isn’t simple or one-sided. You have to think turnover margin and field position play major roles in aiding a defense in keeping opponents from crossing its twenty. So does stopping teams on third downs, though. All of which has been a mixed bag for Georgia over the past few seasons.
All I’m saying here is, if indeed this is something that matters to Smart — and his track record at Alabama would indicate that it does — there’s a lot of work across the board left to be done.