Culture clash in Athens?

So here’s an observation from Seth Emerson in today’s Mailbag:

I am a huge believer in the “culture” of football programs shaping success. That is largely led by coaching staffs and coordinators, and sometimes strong player-leaders. Have you noticed a big culture shift from the Bobo/Grantham era to Pruitt/Schottenheimer? If yes, in what ways are the inner workings of the program different than years past?
– Scott C. Davis

Well, the culture of the offense was just fine under Bobo, as the results show, and he and Pruitt were in sync on a lot of things. So thing can’t be quite grouped together like that.

But there was definitely a cultural change, along with big changes in how things were done behind the scenes, after Pruitt’s arrival. I think Bobo had wanted to do things a certain way – more the Alabama way, for lack of a better term – and Pruitt was able to reinforce that and push Richt that way. That meant some changes in the way practice was structured, the addition of more quality-control and recruiting staffers, and recruiting in general.

The bigger question going forward is how much Schottenheimer could change things, if at all. It’s still hard to get a read on him, as it’s early, plus he hasn’t been made available to the press since January. He comes from the NFL, as many years as Grantham. But unlike Grantham, Schottenheimer enters a situation where the emphasis is on him fitting in, rather than him changing the way things are done.

So far I’ve just seen small, subtle changes from Schottenheimer – such as double-repping quarterbacks at practice – while otherwise he’s doing his best to fit in, and Pruitt remains the bigger power behind the scenes.

We’ve all given Mark Richt his fair share of grief over the years for being slow to change things that obviously weren’t working right, and deservedly so.  But if he’s earned crap for not being nimble enough when things are crumbling, he also deserves credit for the times when he does finally adjust.  Firing Willie Martinez may have been the hardest thing Richt ever had to do as head coach, and he waited a year too long to pull the plug, but in the end, he did it.

And so now we seem to be in the middle of another key period in flux for the program, and Seth’s right that it’s not really about Schottenheimer, who’s not expected to be an agent of change.  Instead, it’s about consolidating the way the program started going about its business after the arrival of Jeremy Pruitt.  It’s noteworthy that Seth sees Pruitt as someone who was able to validate what Bobo wanted to do and that both were able to convince Richt (and Richt, in turn, to convince B-M) that it was worthwhile to chart a new course.

I get the feeling after reading Emerson’s observations that Bobo’s gonna do alright in his new gig.  But I wonder if Pruitt will be as convincing on his own as he was when he was part of a tag team act with someone who clearly had Richt’s confidence after being a part of the program for so many years.  My guess is that if this season goes well, when Pruitt talks, Mark Richt will have no problem listening.

In any event, it should make for an interesting program dynamic to watch play out this season.

31 Comments

Filed under Georgia Football

31 responses to “Culture clash in Athens?

  1. I think it’s one part Mark Richt, one part Jeremy Pruitt (aided by Mike Bobo), and one part Jere Morehead.

    Like

  2. Jim

    If this season goes well, especially on defense, Jeremy Pruitt will probably be a head coach somewhere if not next year, very soon

    Like

    • doofusdawg

      For years I think cmr’s biggest problem was that he delegated too much. The problem was in who he was delegating to. In steps Pruitt who is willing to take the ball and run with it and with a new president as you mention… voila… change. The big question in my mind is whether or not there is enough air in the room for cbs and cjp… which is probably what seth was getting at.

      Like

  3. Thanx Bluto. That was a fun read. Don’t understand why some GTPers hammer on Seth. I must be getting grumpy. I don’t enjoy the Last Resort anymore. Tables too close together. Mamma’s Boy is one big concrete block house and gets way too loud. I’m surprised they get away with packing soooooo many tables in there. Doesn’t match their provided parking. But who counts those things? I always enjoy The Grill.

    Like

  4. While I do not disagree with Emerson’s observation nor yours, the one thing that most overlook in the changes alluded to is – money. That is, the new and unexpectedly large payout from SEC Network ($4 million in the first year) greased the skids for ADGM and Morehead to back spending on salaries, analysts/QC and the IPF.

    Like

    • Scorpio Jones, III

      That’s a pretty cogent observation BI, you mean mo money cures arrogance and nepotism? 🙂

      Like

    • There’s always been money. Just like there’s always been a reserve fund.

      There’s just more now… money, I mean.

      I don’t see how you can deny something happened towards the latter part of 2014 that reflected a change in attitude. And by then, B-M already knew the extra dough was coming.

      Like

      • JG Shellnutt

        Agreed, there was a culture change, a willingness to do things differently – including spending. Hopefully, we’ll see these changes translate into more wins and an upward trend for our dawgs.

        Like

      • Scorpio Jones, III

        Like

  5. Uglydawg

    This discussion seems to be on the cultural practices and attitudes of program management. There is another team culture that involves the attitude and practices of the…team. Since the early days of CMR I have been bemoaning the fact the Georgia plays to the level of it’s opponents. I said in a thread in the old ABH blog (where a lot of us met) that I believed the tendancy to play to the the level on the opponent…was cultivated, un-intentionally, under Donnan and continued under CMR. I love CMR and consider him a fine coach, but still I wonder, who’s gonna stop the rain. I thought it would be Grantham and said so (wrong) and now I’m hoping it’s Pruitt, though the problem did persist last year.
    Sorry this is off the subject…but when I hear terms like “Team Culture” this is what comes to mind.
    So..no..I have not seen a big culture shift in this (what I deem to be the one biggest flaw that has held Georgia back) crucial area.
    Erk..you are missed.

    Like

    • Minnesota Dawg

      Good post. I agree that internal motivation tends to be a problem for Richt’s Georgia teams. The best motivation for the Dawgs always seems to be related to some negative, external influence or related adversity–getting dissed by the media, having your best player suspended, etc–or being called out as soft (Pat Dye, Shawn Williams). When things are going well, complacency seems to immediately set in and….look out, the season-ruining, egg-laying follows soon after. This pattern has repeated so often, that it really seems to be one of culture. I, too, hope that this is something that Pruitt and now Schotty can help remedy, because at this point, CMR is who he is.

      Like

      • Bulldog Joe

        Agreed. For success in athletics and in increased alumni financial support, three components of “The Georgia Way” culture have to be defeated.

        They include:

        The country club culture you described;
        The skimming culture of taking resources away from our athletic programs; and
        The CYA culture of overcompensating for the past transgressions of those no longer involved in the university.

        Each of these cultures is unique to Georgia, as is the opportunity to reap of the benefits of the university’s dominant position in one of our largest talent-producing states.

        There is a very high upside for those fighting the good fight.

        Like

    • Last year’s game against Florida was bad from a mental preparation standpoint, no doubt.

      But I will say that over the past couple of seasons, I really haven’t seen this team quit in a game. Some of the credit for that should go to Aaron Murray, but the 2014 team didn’t stop fighting in a game all year. Even in Jax.

      And that’s different from what we used to see.

      Like

      • Uglydawg

        I’m not trolling the Richt hating bunch. I wouldn’t trade him for anybody. And I’m not speaking of attitude or quitting…I’m talking about squeaking by Tennessee when it should have been a blow out…letting GT hang around..the occasional struggle against Vandy and Kentucky..the games against AzSt…UCF….and Nebraska. While I’m not discounting any of those opponents, Georgia was seemingly in a postiion to beat them badly. The flip side of “playing to the level etc” is the great effort against Alabama in Atlanta, the stomping of Auburn last year, and the handling of Clemson in Athens last year. How can you be on a par with the bottom and top teams of your schedule at the same time?
        I know it’s easy to sit on my sofa and point to these things, but I would like to see a killer instinct that matches the talent level..when we see that, we’ll be watching the Dawgs in the MNCGame.
        As I said…I believe it’s the largest missing component in Georgia’s quest to win it all.

        Like

      • Bazooka Joe

        True, but it does seem like a lack of preparation/getting the team ready to play. Also allowing the players to become complacent regarding an opponent – example FU. There is no way on gods green earth ANY Georgia team should not be properly fired up and working as hard as possible/never overlooking the gators, but that is exactly what happened last year. The players just knew they were going to roll over them and prepared as such. Coaches should never allow that to happen.

        Like

        • Bazooka Joe

          Oh, and sorry I am usually so late in posting/replying (heck you all have moved on to other articles and may not even see these posts of mine, or care to ! haha). Its hot or miss and I cant check the site every day, but try to at least every couple of days and try to get caught up on the info. I love the site and the people here that post (I cant stand the ajc, I can barely read the articles anymore much less the lunatic postings over there).

          Like

        • Coaches should never allow that to happen.

          True ‘dat.

          But as the proud parent of three lovely twenty-somethings, I can say from experience that you can lead teenagers to water, but you can’t make ’em drink. 😉

          Like

  6. ASEF

    We’re definitely seeing a different approach in the ways the program organizes and distributes its resources, most crucially time and money. I have seen so many dysfunctional corporate cultures where employees easily see the discrepancies between the profitability of the enterprise and the demands placed upon employees. It affects focus, morale, and motivation (and hence results) far more than executives want to admit.

    I think the same thing holds true for college football players. All they hear is how exploited they are and how hard they are working to make coaches and athletic department executives rich. If I am a Florida football player (a) being asked to lead voluntary workouts all summer long in the Florida heat, (b) watching videos on Youtube of the facilities at places like Alabama or Oregon, and (c) hearing one more excuse for the lack of an indoor practice facility, then my motivation isn’t operating anywhere close to peak capacity during those workouts. That stuff adds up over the scope of an entire organization.

    But just spending money isn’t on its own going to change anything. It’s more comprehensive than that.

    Like

  7. 69Dawg

    The best motivation is self motivation. It’s easy to assume that the players that are going for the goal of a career in the NFL should be self motivated. These guys make up only a fraction of the team. The rest of the scholarship guys are working for the current benefits. When I worked for the Federal government it was not uncommon, for those not looking for promotion, to settle into “just go with the flow”. Do enough to keep the manager/coach off their butts and keep their free ride. You know that the kids at Alabama know that if they don’t give it their all they will be gone and yet they still get beat. UGA, to its credit, is not as cutthroat as UA so we have to accept that there kids who are just along for the free ride.

    Like

  8. Uglydawg

    69..Don’t know if I buy it that some of the kids are being lazy. I think it’s more an idea that “We have somebody who will make a big play” because it’s written in the Bible that Georgia is supposed to beat this team or that team. It’s not exactly cocky overconfidence as it is naive entitlement.
    The only way I know to change it is to go through a really bad period where you get smacked by reality (see Michigan vs ApSt…Florida vs Ga.Southern, Old Miss vs Jax St.) or the coaching staff figures out how to exercise the demon. I really hope (and believe every year) that UGA will be disinfected.
    Even when..though…CMR gets them on that track, I’m realistic enough to know there will always be the occasional bad loss or a close call to a weaker team. That’s just football. I just want it minimized.

    Like

    • Dog in Fla

      Problem: “or the coaching staff figures out how to exercise the demon.”

      Solution: bring in an outside consultant to help us finish the drill

      Like

  9. Cojones

    The demon that needs to be exercised is a bad-ass D that brings remembrances of Erk’s Junkyard Dawgs and individual players who exercised their demons on some po’-ass offense.

    Like

  10. Thomas Brown UGA

    Reblogged this on Georgia Bulldogs' Blog and commented:

    There is a good read here today, with lots of great comments every one of which says that we need to change the culture where the head coach says that here at Georgia we adhere to something far higher than winning.

    Winning is everything, and nothing else matters.

    We have all resigned ourselves to inexplicable losses every year with this culture the head coach promotes both on the sidelines and his dogged determination that God Called him to a higher Calling than winning he says to us all again and again and in those exact words.

    We have not beat the teams away from Sanford after 2007 like we did until 2007 who ended those seasons as in fact top 25 teams.

    We have not beat the teams who that season went on to a bowl game after 2007, as we did prior.

    Through it all, we have recruited very well.

    The head coach does not care about winning, and this is the reason why the latest current 7-year period has seen us post 29 losses, with seven times 4 losses average per season being only 28 losses instead.

    Always it is someone else who has to bring us this change in culture here that our head football coach has to see winning as everything, and nothing else matters.

    Our Savior.

    Wake up Mark Richt ! This is bull shit that you actually just told us what we’ve all known for years now, that you do not feel that winning is important at all.

    Just tell us how great it is to average 9 dot wins and more than 4 losses a season for 7 years now and counting in 15-game seasons for the top teams.

    We’re not one of the elite programs, have not been for years now, and it is because of the lack of consistency in intensity from our head coach, mimicked by his players and by his coaching staff.

    Just imagine with now over 100 of our Rivals having a Special Teams coach that here at Georgia, a trophy for everyone, we play our walk-ons on Special Teams who are competing against the absolute damn stars of our Rivals. Hell, we still did not even practice Special Teams at the G-Day Game again this season.

    Such bullshit.

    Recruiting goes along merrily, as do all these inexplicable losses every year to lesser-talented teams.

    86 NFL Draft Picks in Mark Richt era 2001-2015 is the 2nd best nationally.

    8 average Scout.com recruiting rankings 2001-2015 also is 2nd best nationally.

    Both to Southern California.

    And, while the average number of years the head coach was at the school who won the actual national championship this entire Mark Richt era, on his watch, is just 3 years, Mark Richt starts his 15th now without one because of this.

    We have once again failed to prepare a QB for the up-coming season, another recurring theme around here along with being told the QB we did see exclusively really once again, is better than those who in fact went on to the NFL as QB.

    Again and again, always the same.

    We play Favorites.

    We spend every off-season studying the schedule and say, well, we can beat all these teams because we have better talent, and then list the games we as a fan base consider the important therefore games.

    Then, we lose more than 4 games a season average for 7 years now.

    We were # 89 in Passing Offense last season, yet none of these 3 studs at QB was given anything but mop-up duty, none told get your butt out there and win.

    GATA.

    Friq, the damned head coach doesn’t give a shit about GATA. He really told us now finally that he does not care about winning – that here at Georgia there is something far more important than winning that we do here at Georgia.

    Freaking dumb shit.

    The problem we as fans have here at Georgia, is that every one of us Loves Mark Richt. Great guy, fantastic recruiter – but, a guy who held himself back with the coaching staff nothing more than a prayer meeting circle for all these years – and, who ultimately did this to us because he really does not think that winning is everything and nothing else matters.

    Like

  11. Pingback: Culture clash in Athens?, a continuing series | Get The Picture