“When our good calls turn into bad calls, that’s a difficult Saturday.”

I’m not quite ready to buy into this premise wholeheartedly, but I have to admit it makes for an intriguing argument.

As the College Football Playoff celebrates its sixth birthday this week, it’s become clear that giving more teams access to play for a national title has not actually given more of them a chance to win it. If anything, the divide now is even greater between the handful of programs that stockpile the best talent in recruiting and the plucky overachievers who might have been able to pull off one upset in the BCS era but now have to do it twice.

We’re getting to the point, though, where even that standard doesn’t paint a complete picture of how difficult it’s becoming to win a national championship in this era of college football. Not only do you need a roster full of blue chips and luck to be on your side, but unless you have an elite quarterback, you can probably forget reaching the ultimate prize.

“You look at the four teams in it right now — and I don’t watch sports and I don’t watch ‘SportsCenter’ — but the best four quarterbacks are on the top four teams,” LSU offensive coordinator Steve Ensminger said. “I think that’s the key to college football right now.”

For the first time in the history of the CFP, all four participants would consider the quarterback position the strength of their team.

If college football really has turned that particular corner, I’m pretty sure that doesn’t bode well for a particular offensive philosophy we’ve all come to know and love this season.

But far more often in college football, you’d see great teams that didn’t necessarily have great quarterbacks. Even as recently as 2015, Alabama won a national title with Jake Coker, who now sells insurance in the Mobile area after a very brief attempt to play in the NFL.

That isn’t meant to disparage Coker, who had a solid season as Alabama’s starter and made a couple key throws in the national title win over Clemson. But Alabama winning championships with guys like Coker and Greg McElroy was reflective of the notion that elite-level quarterback play was a bonus, not a necessity.

“I think those days are done,” said Quincy Avery, a private coach in the Atlanta area who has been associated with a number of top quarterbacks including Hurts and Fields. “When you look at the national championship game — those aren’t like the old days where it’s 20-17. People are putting up points and if you’re not in a position to do that with a guy who can throw the football, you won’t be able to win at the highest level.”

‘Bama had a pretty darn good defense in 2015, if I recall.  That season appears to have made a lasting impression on Saban’s defensive coordinator.  Too bad others have reached a different impression.

And that’s the never-ending nightmare all defensive coordinators now have to live with, particularly this year when every Playoff team is scheming against a quarterback who can individually turn a bad play into a good one.

“You feel like you did right by confusing them in coverage and your reward is that they scramble and go find a guy for a 50-yard gain and you sit there from a coordinator standpoint wishing you’d called something else,” Oklahoma defensive coordinator Alex Grinch said. “But early in the down, you couldn’t have made a better call. When you can’t fool a guy or reap the benefits of a disguise or you brought pressure that wasn’t what they expected and they reap the benefit and you don’t, you go back to, what’s the answer to that? What’s the next thing on the list? When our good calls turn into bad calls, that’s a difficult Saturday.”

It’s hard to see college football reverting back anytime soon to an era where the so-called “game managers” are winning at the highest level. No disrespect to former Alabama quarterback Blake Sims, former Clemson quarterback Kelly Bryant or Michigan State’s Connor Cook, all of whom led teams to the Playoff, but the days of making it this far without a dynamic passing game are likely coming to an end.

To be fair, Kirby came within a whisker of winning a national title with a true freshman quarterback who wasn’t asked to do more than be a good game manager.  But that same approach with the same quarterback two years later didn’t yield anywhere near the same results in the SECCG against a dynamic LSU offense.  What lessons Smart takes from that three-year passage of time will tell us a lot about Georgia’s chances in 2020.

105 Comments

Filed under Georgia Football, Strategery And Mechanics

105 responses to ““When our good calls turn into bad calls, that’s a difficult Saturday.”

  1. James Stephenson

    UGA also had 3 NFL running backs on their roster as Swift will get drafted.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Greg

      and some receivers, don’t buy what he is saying….plenty of “game managers” in the NFL, you just got to have the talent around them to make it work….and to execute. The Patriots have it figured out.

      Things always cycle in college football, DC will soon figure it out (pro offense/spread).

      Like

  2. spur21

    Wolken is more right than wrong. I think someone wrote a song about this very thing – “The Times They Are A-Changin”

    Like

  3. FarmerDawg

    No offensive linemen down field, and adjust the defensive substitution rule. College football is back in balance, you’re welcome.

    Like

  4. Bigshot

    UGA has no chance at the playoffs in 2020. We can get that out of way right now.

    Like

    • Mark

      Eethomas and Saildawg just nailed it with the rule changes. I’m 53 and every time something new works for an offense you hear all these experts say the game has changed and will never go back.

      I can remember 1989 SI NFL preview raving over Randall Cunningham and touting the end of the drop back QB. Then a decade later Manning and Brady come along. Now you’re getting some of that again at the pro level with Lamar Jackson who is basically Vick who can pass. Problem is he is a generational talent and 5-6 more of him aren’t about to appear.

      I could go on about the lack of development of the passing game in HS and College but it will always come back to fundamentally sound football where you can run and stop the run. Our guy gets that and he’ll keep us in the mix.

      Like

      • CEPH

        Keeping you in the mix simply doesn’t get it anymore. A lot of teams are in the so called “mix”

        Like

      • Tony Barnfart

        I don’t recall the sexy punchline, so please forgive me, but recently there was a story about an NFL coach / talent scout bitching about how the league was not getting “prepared” QBs from college like they used to…… then the old college coach responded that maybe the NFL needs new coaches instead of new players.

        They’re paid the big bucks to do the best developing of what comes your way. Not fit a square peg into a round hole—we can get that for way less than $6M per year. If that means you grit your old man teeth and learn something new…..well, that’s why you get paid.

        Like

    • Illini84

      Surrender monkey!

      Like

      • RangerRuss

        Yes sir. Ol Big Shit there is the type of defeatist, quitting troll that should be eliminated from an organization at the onset of operations. That attitude is toxic for a unit.
        Go Dawgs!

        Like

    • I guess that means you won’t watch a single minute of games next season.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Macallanlover

      That is a very, very weak comment, and reflects poor thinking skills, or lack of knowledge about how the process work. Barring a roof collapse in the indoor practice facility, or a disqualification of the program, UGA will be among the top 10 teams for one of the 4 spots. UGA will also be voted the favorite, or one of the top 2 favorites to win the East, which puts you one win away from one of the spots, Of course, you could well be right, most every team has very little chance of making the playoffs so even with very poor thinking, your prediction could be right by pure dumb luck. Only Clemson will, again, have a guaranteed path by just remaining upright. Most people prefer to have knowledge of who will comprise the team before pronouncing them dead (preferring to not reveal, in advance, they have no clue of what they are talking about.)

      Like

      • Bigshot

        I’ve been a Georgia fan long enough to know that something will always go wrong. Before the season even started you lose your top returning receiver. Then you lose your top receiver during the year. Before the SEC championship your top running back gets hurt in the Tech game and the best receiver left gets suspended. In the bowl game you will be without 2 top O lineman maybe 3 depending on what Wilson does. You are down to 2 running backs. And I forgot to say you lost one of your receivers in the Championship game. Something will always go run no matter how great your expectations.

        Like

  5. The 4 hour games are the result of TV time outs plus all of the offense. Offensive pass interference, holding (except in the most egregious cases), and ineligible linemen downfield need to be called consistently.

    By the way, Jake isn’t a game manager. His stats in high school showed he could sling it with anyone. He plays for a coach who wants a game manager to protect his defense.

    I think we all (myself included) underestimated the impact of losing all of that receiving production.

    Liked by 3 people

    • Paul

      I agree that experience shows Jake can sling the ball around given the opportunity. As anyone who has watched him play understands, he works best in rhythm. Kirby chose not to allow Jake to play to his strengths this season. The results were not pretty but they were predictable. So how does our head coach respond? That’s what we’ll be talking about for the next nine months.

      Liked by 1 person

  6. saildawg

    Just from a zoomed out perspective, here is why offenses are having more success
    1) Linemen allowed downfield (LBs no longer able to read their cues)
    2) Emphasis on defensive pass interference
    3) Emphasis on defensive targeting (Both #2 and #3 lead to WR no longer being fearful of going over the middle)
    4) De-emphasis on offensive holding
    5) De-emphasis on offensive PI (particularly pick plays)

    It really makes you tip your hat to the job Kirby and Lanning did with the defense this year. It also makes you want to eat that same hat in why from an offensive standpoint you wouldn’t want to change philosophy. Particularly if the rules are stacked in your favor on offense and from recruiting the talent is stacked in your favor, run more damn plays/tempo. Throw passes over the middle, throw passes more frequently, have more RPO with emphasis on the throw with lineman down field, and have WR route scheme with pick plays.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Agree with everything you wrote, Sail. The problem was this year something was wrong at QB (it’s not that Jake Fromm isn’t talented). The wide receiver play as a personnel grouping in particular was abysmal.

      Like

      • chopdawg

        We should’ve realized this from the beginning. Just because you have a bunch of highly-recruited players at a position, that doesn’t mean the players are going to develop immediately. If Fromm returns I think we’ll have a much more balanced offense next season.

        Like

    • Personally I don’t think what we saw this year had a lot to do with philosophy. Now the philosophy made the Auburn game close when it shouldn’t have been and it made some other games closer than they could have been. But it wasn’t responsible for any of our losses. It was simply execution. Against SC we had 4 turnovers. One bad throw, two the receivers should have caught and one where the receiver went the wrong way. LSU was much the same. Drop after drop and with Fromm seemingly feeling the pressure (he hasn’t forgotten how to throw). Now LSU was a much better team and it would have been a hard fault close battle but it was winnable with the system we had if we executed. Just our first play from scrimmage being executed could have changed the dynamic of the rest of the game.
      Personally I think we have the perfect system. It allows you to do both things well (when executed). It gives the defense more to prepare for. Add to that a QB that can throw well and run well and we would really have something.

      Like

      • I agree with the philosophy. There’s no reason for us to go Air Raid. The problem this year seemed to be NO ONE respected the QB run of the zone read, so that play became just a dive play from the shotgun. I don’t know if that was because Jake had something going on with his health or if Kirby/Coley told him we couldn’t afford to lose him on a running play.

        The Auburn game became close because we blew a couple of coverages that gave up chunk plays when we were trying to exchange plays/yards for clock. We then tried to go turtle mode on offense and couldn’t generate first downs. On the last drive, we went back to attacking the line of scrimmage and stopped them.

        Like

      • saildawg

        I don’t disagree that the system we have now can win championships, but I can count on my hands the number of throws over the middle for the entire season. WR play this year was poor, so that could be the culprit. By the end you just see a very smart and talented QB that had lost all faith in his WR to be on time in the right place. Hopefully we can get back on track. Still would like to see more tempo, more pick play/easy throws, and attacking the middle of the field. Probably they just simply could not execute that this year at the WR position

        Like

      • Pirate

        Sorry but it does not give the d more to prepare for. A gb that can run for a first down gives a dc headaches. . In our system Fromm is out of the play , so it’s 10 on 11 from the start. The is never a zone read because he won’t or is told to never run The reason that Bama , LSU, Ohio st , Ok ,Clemson etc run this is bc it stresses the d on every play . The easy thing to preparing in college is a pro style o

        Like

    • Uglydawg

      Great points, saildawg.

      Like

  7. Mick Jagger

    We need to more pick plays! They are rarely flagged.

    Like

  8. W Cobb Dawg

    Meh, I wouldn’t consider Jalen Hurts an elite QB. He’s benefited from being with two programs with far superior talent than others in their respective conferences. Clemson and tOSU had cakewalks through weak conferences.

    But I will give credit to the playoff teams for getting maximum production out of their QBs. Coaches actually have to ‘coach’ to draw that talent out. That’s the chasm UGA, and other playoff wannabes, have to close.

    Like

    • I agree about Hurts. If I were starting a team from scratch and could pick 1 of the 4 CFP QBs, I would pick Goldilocks. He struggled early in the season, but instead of closing the offense down and win with defense (like someone else did after USCe), Dabo let Lawrence keep shooting. The 2nd half of the season they were unstoppable.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Morris Day

        With a schedule like Clemson’s, maybe Kirby could’ve afforded to let Jake keep slinging?

        Like

        • That’s possible, but Kirby decided he couldn’t trust either Fromm or the receivers. What was different in the Florida game? Healthy Cager? Using the running backs in the passing game? Getting the ball to the tight ends? Jake was 20-30-279-2-0 with 9.3 YPA and a 91.9 QBR.

          Something was different in that game in particular than the rest of the season after the USCe game.

          Like

          • The other Doug

            I haven’t gone back at watched the WLOCP, but I think the difference was Grantham played mostly zone coverage after their DL guy got hurt. Fromm feasts on zone coverage.

            Like

  9. Mayor

    Several posters have put their collective finger on the problem—officiating. The zebras don’t call offensive holding, lineman downfield, pick plays (offensive PI) and Aholt of other penalties that would even the playing field for the D. Plus the hit or miss way they call targeting on basically every hard hit—ugh! If the bastards would just enforce the rules……

    Like

    • Tony Barnfart

      I’m not sure these no-calls are field level decisions as opposed to higher up definitional changes of what constitutes x, y and z.

      Like

      • Mayor

        The decision to not call holding was absolutely made in Birmingham and isn’t just incompetent officiating. The thing that troubles me most about it is that the lack of holding calls goes on and on until the team the suits in Birmingham want to lose snaps off a long run or pass for a TD. Then the hanky comes out and holding is called. Replay shows, yes, the OL grabbed jersey on that play, just like all the other plays in that game. If you’re not going to call holding REPEAL THE DAMN RULE! As it stands now the way holding and several other penalties are called is an open invitation for refs to fix games by selective enforcement.

        Liked by 1 person

  10. TN Dawg

    I don’t think the article is wrong entirely.

    But you can still win with defense, it just needs to be an attacking, disruptive, turnover-causing defense, not a bend-but-don’t-break defense.

    As good as Lawrence and those gifted receivers looked, Clemson mashed Tua into the ground in the NC game last year.

    Create those short fields for your offense and even a game manager like Jake Fromm can put points on the board. Throw in a pick six or a strip six, and you can blow out even a top opponent.

    I think our D this year appeared better on paper than it was, largely contributed to by ball control offense and inferior QB play by our opponents due to injury. We played against a lot of backup quarterbacks this year.

    Like

    • We weren’t bend but don’t break this year. You don’t give up fewer than 300 yards a game by bending. We were fundamentally sound in all 3 levels of the defense.

      Clemson won last year with a bunch of NFL quality guys in the defensive front. If you can get pressure with rushing only 4 consistently, you can pretty much open the defensive playbook and do anything you want.

      Like

      • TN Dawg

        We were next to last in the conference in turnovers created and ranked 67th nationally in sacks. We never blocked a kick.

        We played scared bitch-ball on defense.

        Like

        • We also only gave up 12.5 points and 274 yards a game, and I believe in the top 6 in defensive efficiency.

          If I’m only giving up 12 per game and less than 300 yards per game, that isn’t bend but don’t break defense.

          Complain about the lack of sacks and turnovers all you want, but I also don’t want to see the return of 3rd and Grantham defense either.

          Like

  11. DawgPhan

    Fromm should demand Smart clean house or Fromm should transfer. Smart and company are taking the chance at generational wealth from Fromm.

    I wouldn’t play another down at Georgia without major changes. Fromm would be better off hiring a web coach and training in Florida for the next 15 months.

    Like

    • Greg

      understand what you are saying, but I certainly hope he doesn’t declare. Don’t even want to think about how awful our offense would be.

      Wish him the best if he decides he wants to go, can see him in a NE Patriots uniform now. It would be a good fit IMO.

      Hope things get worked out and he stays. We will probably find out next week (Sugar).

      Like

      • The Dawg abides

        Agree. He’s a perfect fit for NE weather.

        Like

        • Greg

          People get accustomed to it, you adjust. Just because you were born southern, doesn’t mean you can’t.

          But I like snarky smart asses anyway, spices things up…..carry on! 😉

          Like

          • The Dawg abides

            You’re not connecting the dots here. They deflate the balls there, so that would pair well with Jake’s small hands.
            All joking aside, I think he’d be better suited to a team that plays at least half it’s games in a dome. Being Drew Brees’ Heir-apparent would be ideal. Can’t think of a more suitable QB for Fromm to learn the pro game from.

            Like

  12. Dawglicious

    ”Oklahoma defensive coordinator Alex Grinch said.”

    lol…I wouldn’t be ready to buy this argument just yet, either.

    Liked by 1 person

  13. Uglydawg

    “Not only do you need a roster full of blue chips and luck to be on your side, but unless you have an elite quarterback, you can probably forget reaching the ultimate prize.”
    Actually, Georgia in the ’17 NC game had none of these three things to the degree that ‘Bama had them.
    Alabama topped Georgia in all three categories and still Georgia had them beat….except for that one other factor (not mentioned in the three) which turned out to be the largest factor of all.
    As Mayor states a couple of posts above this one, inconsistent or poor or biased (read “cheating”, because that’s what biased reffing is) officiating is often way too determining in who wins.
    Remember Clemson’s big win on a endzone pic? The way Bama got screwed at the end of the first half in this years’ Iron Bowl? The plethora of bad calls and no calls against the Dawgs in the 17 NC game referenced above? Of course there are many, many instances of refs determining the outcome of huge games. These are but a few.
    Fix this and it will be a huge step in the right direction.

    Like

  14. Jeff Sanchez

    BuT FiElDs CaNt ReAd DeFeNsEs

    Like

  15. duronimo

    I don’t believe the problem is Fromm. As has been pointed out, he could sling it in high school in an up-tempo offense. This year the pace of the offense has been painfully slow. And even with all that time in-between, plays get to him so late that he can’t do his normal magic. That’s coaching malpractice. It also falls on the coaches when they don’t get the quarterback into rhythm. It’s true that all the playoff teams have great quarterbacks. In my view, Jake would look just as elite running their offenses.

    Like

    • TN Dawg

      You think Jake would look just as elite as Fields running the zone read at OSU?

      Like

      • Greg

        Why does it matter??

        Like

        • TN Dawg

          It doesn’t.

          But the statement was made that Fromm would look just as elite in the other offenses.

          I don’t really see that as the case. Three of the four quarterbacks in the CFP are dual threat quarterbacks, and it’s likely he would not be able to replicate what those quarterbacks bring to their teams.

          Probably the only plug and play offense for JF out of the CFP teams might be Clemson.

          Like

  16. Bright Idea

    Of course having an elite QB is a huge advantage and how you play lets you recruit those kind of QBs. However, you can win big with man ball I believe if you’re good at it. Georgia was not good at it this year. Vanilla running scheme with no QB run threat and determination to burn clock was the culprit.

    Like

    • BI, your last sentence hit the nail on the head. It seems defensive-minded head coaches just can’t resist the temptation to shorten the game by managing time of possession. That strategy is great when you’re scoring TDs on most possessions … it really sucks when you’re either kicking a bunch of field goals or running clock just to turn the ball over. For some reason (which we’ll never know), Fromm seemed to be told not to run the ball out of the zone read this year. He didn’t need to be Justin Fields or Jalen Hurts to be effective. Pick up 6-7 yards and get on the ground. Make the backside defensive end set the edge rather than crashing down on the running back.

      Like

      • MDDawg

        If Fromm was told never to run the ball (and as you said, we’ll never know) then I’ve gotta believe that the reason is the lack of quality depth behind him.

        Like

      • Cosmic Dawg

        I think it’s most coaches. CMR would do it, iirc Dan Quinn turtled up in that ridiculous Super Bowl. We have 10,000,000 data points that suggest coaches with the lead should (generally) keep doing what got them that lead, b/c every other game we see first half leads disappear b/c coaches whose teams are stomping the other side freak out and stop passing, play prevent defense, etc.

        Between that and the 4th and short punts / FG attempts It’s enough to make you stop watching football. 😉

        Like

  17. The other Doug

    Watch the transfer portal. If Smart goes out and recruits a QB that can come in right away and compete then the plan is to open up the offense.

    I know everyone will say I’m crazy, but I don’t think Fromm finishes next season as the starter. He either declares for the NFL, Smart brings in a transfer, or Beck takes over in the last few games.

    Like

    • If Smart goes to the transfer portal, it will be because Jake has decided to leave.

      Like

      • The other Doug

        I disagree. I’ll be shocked if he doesn’t bring in at least one transfer QB even if Fromm stays.

        Like

        • He may bring one in as a quality backup if Fromm stays. I read your comment as if you think he’s going to bring somebody in to beat Fromm out.

          Like

          • The other Doug

            He has to bring someone in for depth no matter what, and that guy will struggle to beat out Fromm. I also think he is looking for an elite transfer, and that guy will compete with Fromm. The problems is that guy isn’t coming to be a back up.

            Basically, I think the staff has broken down the film and tried everything with Fromm, but it is what it is. If Smart sees a chance to upgrade at QB he will.

            fwiw, I like Fromm and pull for him. I just think he has hit his ceiling.

            Like

            • What elite transfer is going to come in if Jake stays? I don’t see that happening at all.

              I agree with you that Kirby is going to look for a transfer as a quality backup. The question is whether that quality backup would rather go somewhere to get a chance to start.

              If Jake decides to tell all of us to pound sand and goes to the NFL, all bets are off.

              Like

        • Derek

          If the transfer has more than one year of eligibility, maybe. Otherwise, I can’t see the transfer being interested.

          Like

          • The other Doug

            There is a grad transfer type guy out there to add depth. An elite guy will be tricky. I agree about the 2 years, but can’t see a guy coming to compete with Fromm for 1 of those years.

            I’ve stopped doubting Smart when it comes to landing recruits though, so maybe he has some magic to pull it off.

            Like

  18. ApalachDawg

    please

    Like

  19. Derek

    So if you have a great player at the games most important position, that’s a good thing? How profound! Who knew?

    Like

  20. The offensive system (philosophy or whatever you want to call it) still trumps the quality of the QB. Jalen Hurts is a great example. His numbers this year far exceed his production at Bama. They were suggesting he was a liability in the 2018 national championship game and now he’s one of the top 4 QBs and the undisputed leader of OU’s offense. Give me Lincoln Riley’s offense and any one of a dozen QBs…

    Like

  21. With the talent this program has stockpiled it has zero reason to not be in the playoffs moving forward. Coaching is the only thing to hold it back. Everything else is poor excuses.

    Like

    • Derek

      We should definitely win all 12 regular season games and/or the sec championship every year.

      You’d have to be one shit bag coach to sign top three classes year in and year out and wind up in Orlando playing michigan.

      Like

      • RangerRuss

        Hehehehe. Derek called Sabanocchio a shit bag.
        As much as I despise auburn, their cuntofacoach and their trashy fanbase it was truly entertaining watching Nick the dick snivel and whine like a little bitch after that “unfair” loss.

        Like

  22. duronimo

    To answer TNDawg. Jake at the helm of the OS offense wouldn’t look like it does with Fields, but it would be good, reflecting what Fromm brings to the table. As Greg asked “What does it matter?” Hypotheticals only matter as a tool to illustrate a point. In this case the purpose was to support the possibility that there’s nothing wrong with Jake that fixing the coaching & scheme problems (LSU for example) wouldn’t solve.

    Like

    • Derek

      The real question is how many Heismans Tyler Simmons and Matt Landers would have won at OSU?

      Receivers don’t catch. Scheme catches the ball.

      Everyone know this.

      Like

      • FlyingPeakDawg

        Exactly. Ol Kirby is crooting these top players, giving them a fancy jersey and chucking them out on the field to let them succeed. They should know what to do to earn the Heisman.

        Coaches don’t fail, players fail them.

        Everyone knows this.

        Like

        • Derek

          Or, check this out, the truth is somewhere in between…. Think about that! Maybe you need …. BOTH!

          Given that larry coker and les miles and mack brown and gene chizik have natties i know which may be a tad more important.

          I’ll take a vince young or a cam newton. You can have the chalkboard geniuses who would turn Greyson Lambert into one of those with schematics!

          Like

  23. ASEF

    Winning a championship from the SEC means you have to navigate 3 tough opponents in a row.

    The odds the same strategy will work against all 3 are low.

    You have to be able to attack opponents everywhere. On offense, that means abusing their slot CB if he is the weak link. Or a safety who is consistently a half step late recovering into coverage off of play action. It means being as good over the intermediate and deep middle of the field as you are in the running game.

    Clemson got lucky last year. They faced one team with equivalent talent, and that opponent’s weak link was Clemson’s strength. Perfect match up.

    But what are the odds Georgia ever finds itself in that situation? The offense has to be excellent at multiple things. And that starts with the QB and an offense that plays to his strengths.

    Liked by 1 person

  24. UGA '97

    Our DB depth/play in 2017, 2018 towards the end of those meaningful games mattered. This year a shoot out seems the only real answer to beat LSU since non of the top DB groups have stopped the Brady-Burrow offense yet. Here’s looking at you Ohio State & Clemson.

    Like

  25. MGW

    It’s not that black and white. But the days where high scoring offenses get stumped by elite D’s every time are over. The most talented teams are focused on scoring a lot of points and they’re going to score more on your elite D than your mediocre O is every time. Used to be elite D and mediocre offense beat elite offense and mediocre D. That, generally, has flipped.

    Also the way rules have been interpreted and the way they are applied regarding the RPO and downfield blocking have given defenses a similar damned if you do damned if you don’t decision making process to the way they have to defend the triple option. So a team doesn’t have to he as talented as they used to need to be to move the ball on an elite D.

    Like

  26. Biggus Rickus

    Yeah, remember how easy it used to be to win a national title and when QBs weren’t at all important? I mean, who ever heard of Charlie Ward or Kerry Collins or Tommie Frazier or Danny Wuerfful or Tee Martin or Tom Brady or Chris Weinke or….Do I need to keep going?

    Like

    • Classic City Canine

      Buck Belue says hi.

      Like

      • Dylan Dreyer's Booty

        HW34 says he needed Buck to throw one good short pass to Lindsay.

        And you know, call me Captain Obvious, but regardless of system isn’t it always true that if good calls turn into bad calls it is going to be a difficult Saturday? It’s a nothing hypothesis to me because adjustments can and will be made. Alex Grinch just hasn’t figured it out, but when someone does, and someone will figure it out, Avery will be wrong.

        Like

      • Biggus Rickus

        1980 was a long time ago.

        Like

  27. Hobnail_Boot

    Fromm really game managed that 80-yard bomb to Mecole, amirite?

    Fucking ridiculous.

    Like

  28. Pirate

    This is classic so I guess LSU just practiced harder and got better. Or maybe they ran a different scheme. I guess fields just got much better or he is in a different scheme. Maybe hurts got 50 tds and 4600 yards of offense because he threw balls through a tire. I’ve heard people claim urban Meyer the greatest coach on earth. And Meyer said the offense is built around they players. Blah blah. Then why did urb run the spread at every stop BG , Utah , Fla , Ohio st . Because the rules of the game and qbs like Scam. Deshawn ,Lawrence and Fields give you a chance to win it because they touch the ball every play. I’ve heard folks say “ we run more stuff than Ohio st “ yes we do. That is the problem. In these playoffs, 3 teams will run the same 4 or 5 base plays over and over again. ( they have been repping them for the entire year so they get the timing down. The other team will run 7 or 8 plays the entire game same deal been running since the beginning of camp. So if one has to describe an offensive philosophy of any of these teams , what is it.

    1 spread
    2 tempo
    3 rpo
    4 no sub for the defense unless hurt or short yardage.

    What does ‘this do to the defense.
    1 the offense dictates to the defense ( how the d lines up )
    2 the d must play the width and length of the field
    3 the d line cannot read their keys bc lineman can block 3 yard down the field.4 so example . Use Ohio st bc we lost Fields

    Double slots ,no tights .fields in the gun and dobbins to his left . Dobbins across fields face to the right ,and the back side d must stay home or fiields pulls it and gets 5, 10 50 or throws it over your head on every play , Defense must stay honest on each play .That is the ball of wax on every play the opposing d must defend 3 options or now they call it rpo.

    Uga lets the best qbs and receivers leave the state almost every year bc we run the New York Giants offense ,while all the high schools in ga run the spread.again we made fields look bad last year ( and he had plenty of receivers) also burrow is playing for it all and LSU scored 46 at Bama and 0 last year at home with the same personnel.
    The Baltimore Ravens run Ga southern o from 1985, but I digress.
    The question is not if ga offense is going to change but when . I just wish erk had a shot up there. There would be a lot mor hardware in the case.

    Like