The Brady Hoke Rule

You may have heard that the SEC did pass one very sensible rule yesterday requiring the placement of a conference-selected observer in each press box watching for players who seem to have suffered head injuries.  Andy Staples has some of the details:

“It will be someone that the conference puts there, not the institution,” Slive said. “It will give us another check if, on the field, a team doesn’t see that a player sustained a head injury.” Those observers, who will either be physicians or certified athletic trainers, will have open lines of communication to the teams’ sidelines. They’ll also have the ability to alert the officiating crew. If the player with the apparent head injury looks like he’s staying on the field for the next play, the observer can use the replay official’s equipment to alert the referee, who will then stop play until the player is taken off the field to be evaluated. Even if the player is OK, he must miss the next play or his coach must call timeout to get him back on the field.

None of the coaches objected.  (Given the safety bullshit Saban and Bielema argued last year in proposing the 10-second substitution rule, it would have been hypocritical to the max for them to have uttered a peep about this now.)  Some of that may have been due to Slive’s sales pitch.

It may be a sign of how critical this issue is to the future of the game that SEC coaches—the freakiest of control freaks—offered no resistance to the policy. “None of our coaches had a problem with that,” Ole Miss coach Hugh Freeze said. It probably helped that when presenting the policy, SEC officials showed footage of Michigan quarterback Shane Morris taking a vicious shot to the head against Minnesota last season and staying in the game. Morris was in obvious distress, but he waved off help from the sideline. Later, then-Michigan coach Brady Hoke would say no one on the sideline or in the coaches’ booth realized Morris might have suffered a head injury.

Helluva legacy you’ve left, Brady.

17 Comments

Filed under SEC Football, The Body Is A Temple

17 responses to “The Brady Hoke Rule

  1. adam

    What’s the over/under on the number games it takes before there is a controversial player removal at a key moment in the game?

    Like

  2. Spike

    What Hoke did was shameful.

    Like

    • Dan Dombos

      Deserving of shame, yes. But there are prerequisites for feeling shame (understanding, awareness, and mental competence) that Brady Hoke would not meet in a court of law.

      Like

  3. BMan

    It’s a good rule. Now if they would also charge that same person with pointing out some obvious missed kill shots that should have been penalized, we could call that the Aaron Murray Rule.

    Like

  4. Russ

    It’s a good rule, and I’m glad they’re doing it.

    However, the “Penn Wagers” voice in my head imagines this conversation between the booth and the official on the field: “Chubb took a pretty good shot to the head when he ran over that linebacker and two DBs on the last play. Better have him sit the rest of this series (1st and goal from the 9) while he’s checked out.”

    Like

  5. Spike

    BMan.. I’m with you!

    Like

  6. Cojones

    What if play is stopped for replay of injury (?) perception and a foul is spotted that wasn’t called?

    Like

    • Cojones

      Suppose it’s a poke in the eye that keeps him down after unpiling? It hurt, but not so much that his vision was affected and he is able to stay in the game; what then?

      Like

      • Cojones

        Will you be required to call time out to keep him in the game after he was fouled by the other team; or, is the play reviewable and the foul can be called?

        Like

  7. AusDawg85

    If I’m a DC getting steamrolled on a series, I’m telling somebody to waltz around looking dazed after the next play to stop the action. same as faking an injury I guess, which no one ever does.

    Like

  8. Nate Dawg

    It is a good rule. But it’ll get Dawg-graded just like the targeting bullshit that cost us the Vandy game. Can’t WAIT for that!!

    Like

  9. 69Dawg

    When will the CFB wise up and give the reply ref the power to overturn penalties that are clearly wrong. He’s watching and reviewing why not let him buzz the ref and say your crew screwed that call wave it off. I know the officials would be pissed at the call and embarrassed but screw them. Ever wondered why no call by the referee is ever overturned, could it be because he is the crew chief and the review official wants to keep his job. You can usually tell the best crews because the referee actually talked to the members of the crew to insure that they agree with a call. The majority of the crews just take the word of the guy throwing the hankie and mark it off.

    Like

    • Mayor

      I agree with everything you said in your post above, 69. What are we going to do with the situation where the TV ref is reviewing a holding call, finds there was no holding, but during his review sees a targeting that wasn’t called. Can the TV ref call the targeting (or whatever other foul he sees)?

      Like

  10. Debby Balcer

    I wonder if Arkansas’ quarterback would have been pulled last year with this rule in place.

    Like