Observations from the 35, Notre Dame edition

Move over, Texas A&M.  College football’s real 12th man was in Athens, Georgia Saturday night.

I can’t say I really noticed much difference in the pre-game electricity out in the parking lot from other big games, but once inside Sanford Stadium, hoo boy.  That crowd was tanned, rested and ready thirty minutes before kickoff.  Nor did it need any encouragement once the game commenced.  I still say the last eight minutes of the fourth quarter in the 2013 LSU game is my gold standard for home crowd noise, and while I won’t claim that level was surpassed Saturday night, I will insist that it was sustained for a much longer period in this game.

It clearly had an effect on the visitors, too.  Given how well prepared Notre Dame looked in all other facets — somebody used their bye week to excellent effect — it was a surprise that a team that’s certainly appeared in its share of big road games seemed so ill-equipped to handle what that Georgia crowd threw at it.

Give yourselves a collective pat on the back, Dawg fans.  You earned it, in spades.

  • Georgia played a game against the seventh-ranked team in the country, down two starting cornerbacks, lost its starting offensive left guard mid-way and didn’t play its starting offensive right tackle until the second half because of injury concerns.  And won.  Team depth ain’t a myth, peeps.
  • I don’t know if they were over-hyped for their first real opponent of the season, or because it was a night game, or what, but the Dawgs were clearly off their game in the first quarter.  That was most apparent in offensive blocking, which was, for wont of a better word, shoddy.  I saw more missed blocks in the first quarter than I’d seen in the first three games, combined.  It was most apparent when Georgia ran screen plays that were consistently blown up because Notre Dame players were left free to make tackles — and they didn’t miss.  Biggest offenders in that regard were Mays, surprisingly, and Wolf.
  • Early on — okay, for most of the first half — Georgia had problems with Notre Dame’s game plan on both sides of the ball.  Kmet hadn’t played prior to Saturday night and Georgia’s defense clearly wasn’t prepared for how to handle him.  Notre Dame’s focus on getting the ball out of Book’s hands quickly also negated Georgia’s desire for havoc.  Meanwhile, Georgia’s offense stalled because the Irish committed all sorts of numbers to the line anticipating the run  (a couple of times, I counted ten men within five or six yards of the line of scrimmage, with only a safety back) and Georgia found its short game regularly stuffed.
  • That being said, the coaches made two adjustments at halftime that paid big results:  using tempo on offense to open up Notre Dame’s defense and jamming the Irish receivers at the line (and then bracketing Kmet downfield).
  • That being said, Smart abandoned much of that for much of the fourth quarter and let the momentum slip away as a result.
  • It was not a night when the coaches trusted a lot of freshmen, for whatever reason, but those who played on offense and defense made contributions.  Pickens blocked well (and should have been the beneficiary of at least one pass interference call).  Blaylock had a couple of nice catches.  Smith didn’t have a sack, but came up big on ND’s last play of the game.  But no Zeus or Stevenson was a bit puzzling to me.
  • The offensive line’s struggle with numbers in the first half maybe wasn’t that surprising.  But it gained significant traction in the second half, partly due to a change in the playcalling, and also because Wilson was a significant upgrade at right tackle over Mays.
  • Cager and Robertson had big games at wideout.  The former has really impressed me over the last two games with his blocking and receiving and may be turning into this year’s version of Wims.
  • You can only keep D’Andre Swift down so long.
  • Brian Herrien continues in his role of unsung hero.  Reliable, quicker than he’s given credit for sometimes and a good receiver, he used all of that to turn in another valuable game.
  • Fromm had another one of his patented “not everything shows up in the box score” kind of games.  His back shoulder throws to Cager were as good as anything Aaron Murray dialed up.  He showed toughness on his runs.  He didn’t let himself get rattled when Notre Dame’s pressure forced his timing.  He is the glue that holds Georgia’s offense together.  (It was also kind of funny to watch his protest with the ref when the second ND defender took a seat after a play.)
  • There were two stories on defense.  The biggest one was the way the rest of the secondary stepped up when Stokes left the game.  Reed played out of his mind and LeCounte may have played his first game where I didn’t seem him whiff on a tackle.  Divaad Wilson rose to the challenge, to say the least.
  • The other story was the fantastic game Tae Crowder turned in.  He’s had a knack for being in the right place at the right time all season, but against Notre Dame, he consistently finished what he started.  His tackle to blow up that screen pass was perhaps the best defensive play of the season.
  • The other great defensive play of the night, worth its own bullet point, came on Reed’s interception, which was the result of playing a flea flicker to perfection, first with a perfectly timed blitz that affected Book’s timing, then, Reed’s complete awareness of how the play unfolded, capped off by the athleticism it took to take the ball and finish in bounds.
  • Notre Dame’s running game was shut down.  Some of that, to be fair, could be credited to two of its top backs being out, but Georgia’s speed had a lot to do with it, too.  Still, if there’s one thing I was puzzled by, especially considering how good a game ND’s offensive coordinator called, it was how little Ian Book was asked to do running the ball.  (That’s not a complaint.)
  • All that aside, it was incredibly disappointing watching Notre Dame’s offense rip down the field after Georgia’s last score.  Why the DBs started giving Claypool and Kmet cushions in coverage after the good job they’d done bottling them up is something to question.
  • Rodrigo Blankenship was money.  The rest of Georgia’s special teams was a check that bounced.  Simmons’ fumbled punt made the game closer than it should have been (and he was shaky on his first fair catch, too.)  Blocking on punt returns was ineffective.  Cook’s decision to run out the kickoff to start the second half was ill-advised.  So was Blaylock’s decision not to field a punt.  Camarda looked like someone who played tight in a big game; his last punt could have been the prelude to a disaster had the defense not bailed him out.

Georgia was outplayed at times and was definitely outcoached.  What it wasn’t was out-athleted, and that’s why it prevailed.  I know Kirby’s happy with the win — hell, so am I — and he’s happy that his team manballed just enough to get it done, but this was not one of the staff’s finest hours.  Still, it’s not every day you beat a top ten team.  In that kind of setting, survive and advance will always work for me.

82 Comments

Filed under Georgia Football

82 responses to “Observations from the 35, Notre Dame edition

  1. William H.

    Wolf in particular was a liability blocking on the edge. Many a screen or dump pass to the flat was blown up by his negligent blocking. Thank heavens none of the backs got hurt do to this. The first time, I shrugged it of. The fifth time I started fearing for someone’s life.

    Also, that third quarter changed the game and was more reminiscent of last year’s team. The 4th quarter was a reminder to always keep the gas pedal down!

    Like

    • Tony Barnfart

      But Wolf did have a clutch first down catch with two defenders on him swatting at the ball the second he had it secured.

      Like

  2. Dawg151

    Tae Crowder’s play was definitely Roquan-esque.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Geezus

    I think they kept Book from running because they couldn’t afford for him to take too many shots. He would have taken some big hits and I think there is a big drop off at QB for them.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. AlphaDawg

    Fix the muffed punt, the 2 shanks and account for that big tight end and I think we cover the spread. Even with all that happened I was never really worried about this game. Like most everyone else I didn’t like the late field goal.

    I took the oldest AlphaDawg and we had a great time in town, got there around noon with very light traffic. Got to see one of my old roommates I haven’t seen since 1999 (he flew in from Alaska for the game). The stadium and the environment was amazing. The oldest Alphadawg has her college choices narrowed down to UGA, UVA, and College of Charleston. I’m hoping the atmosphere Saturday night helps influence her final decision.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Tony Barnfart

      Tell her she can go live in Charleston after college (at UGA) and still get the entirety of the value behind the college of Charleston experience for years to come. But you can only be a student in the best college town once, where who you are and what you’re doing is the center of the universe.

      Like

  5. Yurdle

    Coley (or Smart) called a C at best. Too much was short and lateral. They got it figured out in the second half, though.
    The QB spy was ineffective all night. Didn’t catch the number, but Book was getting outside and beating the spy to the edge in critical situations.
    JR Reed is a man.
    Color me no longer worried about WR.

    Like

    • Reverend Whitewall

      The most egregious time letting Book scramble was when he converted on a scramble towards the end of the game. The defensive call was perfect – it was a double spy, but both spies let themselves get sucked into the middle as the play developed and got caught in traffic. That one was on the players, not the coaches.

      But yeah, totally agree on Coley. Then, after the side to side stuff has been shut down all game, and he seemingly had gotten the message, what does he call on first down on our final drive? A sweep that gets thrown for lost yardage like most of the rest of our east/west plays had been all game long. I knew any chance of getting a first down to seal the game was gone right there. Coley loves that side to side stuff, and it looks great when you’re playing Vandy, Ark St, etc because your athletes are so much better than theirs. But a good D is gonna sniff out those screens and sweeps. Those can’t be your bread and butter plays, they gotta be the ones you just mix in here and there to keep the D off balance.

      Liked by 1 person

      • The other Doug

        I don’t fault Coley for trying to exploit the edges, but why did he stick with it?

        Liked by 1 person

        • Russ

          Agreed. I thought that was the correct plan going in, but it was obvious it wasn’t working. Should have adjusted before the second half. Luckily the defense came to play once they decided to cover Kmet.

          Like

  6. Argondawg

    We play ugly against a top 10 team and win. This is not the Georgia of old. Playing our early schedule it really is hard to gauge where your weaknesses are and what you have to work on. ND has very good players and are very disciplined and well coached. Win, learn and move on. We played tight most of the night and that felt like coaching. Did we ever stretch the field?

    Liked by 1 person

    • Nope, and they were begging us to with a lone safety at most over the top. We tried a few late to Pickens, one of which was definitely a missed PI call (Replay showed on both of his missed PI throws the ND player grabbed his jersey in the endzone, and his pads around the neck on the sideline throw)

      Watching Mecole Hardiman burn NFL safeties the past 2 weekends makes me want to rip my hair out. Why recruit all this speed if you’re not going to cut them loose other than for 4 yard outs and jet sweeps?

      Liked by 1 person

    • Cojones

      They practiced tackling all week to make sure our RBs didn’t get loose and also worked on slipping through the O line. That was their best chance to win and they demonstrated that they had worked on it when comparing to their last two games before playing us.

      You stated the rest that is important.

      I feel this was the right moment for such a lesson to our O and think we will finish the year going faster and faster. Coaching was no worse than any other team playing Sat and I don’t feel the circumstances for adjustment will dictate other games by the same play we saw by ND, i.e., they just sharpened our iron for the rest of our schedule.

      Like

    • Dawg1

      ND is a top 7 team who has gotten huge accolades for playing UGA tough. Herby almost wet himself with ND praise – and they lost.

      Let that truly sink for a minute where UGA is now. When a historic program is measured by their moral victory against you, you are doing something right!

      They came up short against a measuring stick in college football — one of 4 IMO (UGA, AL, Clem, OSU).

      Liked by 1 person

  7. MDDawg

    Speaking of coaching, I thought I heard one of the commentators mention that ND had to go to their silent snap count after the first drive or so. The fact that they didn’t do that from the very beginning just blew me away. Not that I’m complaining, but how could they not have seen that coming?

    Liked by 2 people

  8. Governor Milledge

    In my re-watch, it jumped out how lazy the team was about getting off a snap after Fromm’s run – the replay booth did not step in until 10 seconds left on the play clock. Why not keep up the tempo, fast snap it, and not even have the debate about FG/going for it in that situation?

    Like

    • 79Dawg

      I dunno – it seemed to me (in the stadium) that they were setting the play clock super early from almost the start of the game, and both teams were constantly burning it close to the end of the 40 seconds. With that, it seemed like we were taking a lot of time to get the calls in – if Coley is having trouble calling plays from the field in a timely manner, maybe he should go back upstairs and give that a try…

      Liked by 1 person

  9. Governor Milledge

    Cager also seemed to be so prominently featured due to his size at 6’5″, and he rose to the occasion – a lot harder for ND to no-call interfere with a guy that height

    Like

  10. Otto

    In my opinion UGA was over excited playing jittery not nervous but over amped like they drank a pot of coffee and couldn’t hold on to anything much of the 1st half. I am glad we have that game out of the way as I think it well serve the team well. Thankfully the Stadium also cost ND multiple time outs and I believe 6 false starts.

    Yes I agree on many of the points especially coverage and giving cushions late. Herrien is underrated. I wanted to see him have a big year as I thought he was a very good RB and loyal for not transferring out. He is proving reliable.

    I was expecting to see a bit more of Cook on the field with Swift or Herrien.

    It was good to see Fromm get some runs. He had a big run toward the goal line which reminded me of the Miss St game 2 years ago. He is faster than he looks, tough, and it is helpful in slowing down a D.

    I’ll take the W and move on. It was an intense game, well deserved W. Part of me likes the close W as it keeps the team from getting overly high. Smart has plenty to coach on.

    The game should also have shown well to recruits which Smart was certainly lining them up to get in the game. What an atmosphere on TV, I can only imagine in person.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Cojones

      The biggest problem seemed to be the blocking for the RBs not performed by the WR and TEs as in the past. These are easily fixable for the future, but we all have to understand that ND showed the remainder of our schedule what they have to do to make it close with us.

      Like

      • Otto

        Yes they blocking wasn’t at expected level did but as you said the problems are fixable. It was the 1st big game and an over amped big game. I am not overly happy with the performance but I am very happy to have the W.

        In coach speak, UGA did not play to their standard. Further I am optimistic about the season.

        Like

  11. Gurkha Dawg

    I think the offensive game plan was to get our great athletes out in space against their much less athletic defenders. We missed some blocks and ND put on a clinic of great tackling. So it just wasn’t working. We obviously should have changed things up earlier. If we hadn’t tried to get guys out in space, people would be bitching about us not doing it. Hindsight is 20/20, but the coaches did seem slow to adjust.

    Liked by 2 people

  12. Aladawg

    Ditto. My only 2 comments are that Kirby is developing a very clear and troubling pattern of taking the foot off the gas and playing not to lose and NOT imposing his will (see 4th and 1) when that’s all his mantra is about. This pattern demonstrates stubbornness not dissimilar to our past coach. The Senator is slap on. We won that game because we had better athletes and we made it close because our on the field coaching was C grade at best. One thing is for sure. I’ll take having better players and recruits over a C grade coaching job.

    Like

    • Bright Idea

      Kicking the FG on 4th and 1 was a 50/50 call IMO but passing near the end and not forcing ND to burn their only timeout was the worst. They got the ball back with 2 minutes left with one TO when it could have been closer to one and no TOs. If every position is up for competition do we not have another punter? Not one shank but two!#&%@ just damn!

      Like

  13. The other Doug

    That Reed interception….

    Everyone needs to rewatch that thing. First, watch it from Ian Book’s perspective. There’s a lot going on, but he sees his man and he has time to throw. He’s thinking done deal. Next watch Reed. The dude is no where near the play but he starts running the moment the intended target emerges. Once Book commits he turns on the jets and gets there easily. He didn’t dive to make the play. Nope. He is 100% in front on the receiver. Book had to get to the sideline and say “where the F did that dude come from?!?!?!”.

    Also, that INT will be studied by every QB and OC we face this year, and they won’t like what they see.

    Liked by 3 people

    • saildawg

      Agree, someone needs to break it down frame by frame. He not only does not bite on the fake, he maintains his deep cover 2 responsibility, only to recognize that Book is being flushed and cant make a 60 yard throw. He covers nearly 20 yards of field in nearly one second to put himself into position to make a great interception. Finest piece of playing safety I have seen in a long time

      Liked by 2 people

  14. I don’t know much about the X’s and O’s for special teams, but Landers was getting outgunned by (I think) Claypool on punt returns. In both of Simmons’s first-half punt returns (one of which was the muff), Landers’s guy was right in Simmons’s face on the catch. While Simmons is ultimately responsible for the muff, Landers deserves some of the blame too.

    Also, I have been thinking a lot about the final FG decision. I get that you should have confidence in your offense, which was rolling at the time, but they had been stuffed a few times already throughout the game. I really think that giving our momentum to ND at that point would have lost us the game – the math didn’t make a ton of sense on taking the field goal, but I agree with the decision because of the intangibles.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Otto

      Agreed they had stopped UGA at time. What I disagree with is the D giving cushions and the offense going conservative after going up 13 not the FG. The FG should be automatic with Hot Rod. Go up 13 play continue to play aggressive and likely get another score to go up 16 or 20.

      Like

    • Biggen

      Thinking it over, I don’t mind taking the FG. Rod is damn near automatic. Then they have to score two TDs to win.

      Had we gone for it on 4th and 1 and didn’t get it, they can play for either OT or a win. It would have really put them in the driver’s seat and would have opened up the rest of the their playbook.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Dylan Dreyer's Booty

        I wanted them to get a first down and not come up short on the 3rd down play. Once they came up short, I wanted them to kick. Few things in football are as predictable as Rodrigo at that point. I understand that the reward from making the first down is better, but not making it is a disaster. If Rod had missed we’re no worse off than going for it and missing. Call it playing it safe if you want, but I call it playing to win.

        Liked by 1 person

  15. Dylan Dreyer's Booty

    Sounds like some of y’all are missing Chaney. Jes’ sayin’. 😉

    Like

  16. more spinners

    Camarda is looking like a bust.
    Two bad punts.
    He can not handle big games. Go back to that bowl game with Texas.
    Squatted down like girl to pick up a low snap.
    Smart needs to recruit a punter.
    Blankenship. Sooo consistent. He has the passion to kick, and he likes to win!

    Like

  17. I need someone to explain to me why all of our shot plays are down the sideline. I don’t believe for a second that Pickens and Blaylock and DRob can’t beat someone on a post. Those sideline shots are safer, yes, but they are tough throws and really hard to hit a receiver in stride.

    Like

    • Jared S.

      Fromm is killer at those sideline shots though. Time and again.

      Like

    • W Cobb Dawg

      Yep, and the boundary line acts as a second defender.

      A few weeks back there was a post comparing our (new?) approach to some of the things New England does. But you never see Brady working the sidelines like we do. No east-west b.s. in the Pats offense. They come right at you.

      Like

    • tbia

      I agree. :Maybe Fromm’s worst throw of the game was the pass to Blaylock that he trapped and it was reviewed. A good pass and he has running room. Question why we didn’t go back to that route.

      Like

    • Bulldog Joe

      Georgia practices these sideline throws / catches a great deal as most good defenses are geared to protect the middle-third first. It’s great to have a QB who can put it there consistently, but it requires great awareness, athleticism, and balance on the part of the receiver to pull this off.

      Unlike LSU, Notre Dame doesn’t see this in practice or from the teams on its schedule. Georgia exploited it well. Cager and Robertson are experienced and can do it consistently. Pickens has the athletic skills but is still learning. Without this level of preparation and skill, Georgia likely loses the game.

      Like

  18. Texas Dawg

    My observations:
    1) Carmada can not handle the big stage and will cost us a game at some point.
    2) Playing not to lose instead of playing to win is going to cost us AGAIN at some point (Alabama, Alabama, Alabama). Did I mention Alabama?
    3) J.R. Reed is the glue that holds that defense together
    4) Hot Rod is the opposite of Carmada. He seems to thrive on the pressure of the big moment. Who ever takes over for him next year has some XXXXXL shoes to fill.
    5) It must be illegal to call a pass inference penalty on anyone covering a Georgia receiver. What the refs deem “incidental contact” would be considered felony assault in most jurisdictions.
    6) Special teams in general (other than Hot Rods Bunch) are in SERIOUS need of work
    7) We still get sucked inside and let guys get outside (Ian Book’s scramble) way too often.
    8) Cade Mays is an elite right guard ( a really nasty on) but not quite quick enough when pitted against blue chip edge rushers
    9) Jake Fromm has ice water in his veins
    10) It would be great to have that crowd at every game, but alas, it is hard to work up a lot of emotion for Murray State (in the middle of the day)

    Like

    • psyopdawg

      Great roll up. I’m also confused with the moniker “Incidental Contact”. Can anyone explain to me a good example of incidental contact? sportingcharts.com defines it as: “At the discretion of the official, incidental contact is when marginal contact occurs between two or more players but a foul has not been committed”. Huh? So if player B falls onto player A but it wasn’t intended and, in either small or large part, interfered with player A’s ability to catch a football it’s “Incidental.

      I get some hand to hand play between receiver and defender is gonna go on but physical contact that inhibit’s a players ability to catch the ball is PI.

      Like

  19. LFCDawg

    The atmosphere for that game was electric. I’m still hoarse today. Kudos to the student section that brought it all night long, with passion. The new LED lights worked for me. When they lit it up before the 4th quarter, you could see the players definitely getting into it. I guess a new tradition is born. Not sure how that will look during a day game, but Saturday night it was cool.

    Like

  20. WSS

    Senator, ND Coach commented prior to the game that GA was running simple routes probably due to the lack of experienced WR’s. Is that a part of the reason that our passing attack was geared toward short yardage plays primarily, and do we anticipate more explosive production after the bye week and as the season progresses?

    Like

  21. Prosticutor

    Simmons muffs the punt inside the 10, drops a potential td pass in the end zone (ok, it was a tough catch). If I were a betting man, I would’ve opened a point shaving investigation when the game was over.

    Like

    • Macallanlover

      That is some crazy BS there, shame on you. I have seen MLB players get in on the head with pop ups, every player, football, or baseball, has muffed a catch. Tennis players and golfers have whiffed completely. (And they don’t have big, fast men coming full speed toward them.) That end zone catch was about an 8+ on a difficulty scale. Stop with the silliness..

      Like

  22. Cojones

    Remember the QB coach saying he was striving for Fromme to up his average from the high 60s? Fromme’s average is in the low 70s thus far.

    Like

  23. siskey

    My observations from my couch (attempting to deal with my anxiety while also not getting too intoxicated or lashing out at my wife or kids) is as follows:
    Fromm- He is the best QB that we have had since I became a fan in the early 90s. I loved the promise of Stafford and loved Murray for his grit and skills, but Jake has so much moxie and has a tremendous ability to stay focused. Those throws to Cager and the one to D-Rob that was broken up were Aaron Rodgersesque.
    The Running backs- Swift and Herrien both got yards when needed and seemed to get better as the game went on. I would have liked to have seen the two have more carries and to possibly see the other guys but it was a big game and a fumble by someone with less experience could have cost the game.
    Defense- The secondary played great at times and was spotty at times. I am unsure as to what lead to the TE being open so often in the 1st Half but for to be down our top two CBs after the first series we played really well. Crowder has really turned into a player for us even if he may have been responsible for the TE on many of his receptions. If Smith were a foot closer to Book on the last play he would have had a Bellamy type sack to end the game.
    Special Teams- Hotrod will be missed. I am always nervous when we kick FGs but he is has done a lot to remove many of my fears.
    Coaching- I agree with the critiques regarding the East-West gameplan and I think the hope was that since ND had so many people near the line of scrimmage that our better athletes would ultimately break one forcing them to spread out so that we could run up the middle with more efficiency. Good job by the coaches in recognizing that this was not working and going to a gameplan that allowed us to control the ball and get back to our strengths. I would have liked to have seen us go for it on 4th and 1 and think that we could have gone up 17 points but I understand the thinking behind kicking the FG. If we had a different kicker then I think we would have gone for it.
    Opponent- ND played great. Danielson spoke about how well ND tackled in the first half and it was true. In almost every situation where there was an opportunity for a one-on-one tackle, the ND player made it. ND was a very well-coached team who executed to the best of their ability.
    Overall- Very relieved and proud of the team. I wish we had a big out of conference game at home like this every year before we get into the SEC schedule.

    Liked by 1 person

  24. Tyler

    Great points, and great win. Officiating was really frustrating. Several times it took them way too long to review/call a play; obviously the non calls on PI were terrible. Watching the replay they were even more obvious than in the stadium. Can’t believe GD was calling them in incidental contact. And targeting could’ve/definitely should’ve been called on Jakes long scramble that came up just short of a first down. The last defender lowered his helmet AND hit Jake in the helmet. The fact that it was reviewed and never even mentioned by the broadcast was infuriating.

    Stadium was amazing. I was there for Auburn 2007 and it topped that atmosphere. After the game ended everyone mostly stayed in their seats for a time. Mostly to take in the joy of a big time win, but also I think a lot of us had PTSD at how well ND played. Hats off to them they didn’t miss many, if any, tackles and Kmet ate our lunch.

    Like

  25. Charlottedawg

    Random stream of consciousness thoughts

    someone forgot to tell Notre Dame their rush defense sucked and they had no chance against our rushing attack. They put on a clinic in regards to both tackling and defeating blocks on the perimeter
    game ball to the Sanford stadium crowd
    Cade mays is much more effective as a guard than a tackle
    as someone who thought that pounding the rock was our best plan of attack mid way through the 3rd quarter, I thought, fuck it lets just put the game in Jake’s hands
    I still have no idea how Jake picked up the bad snap and made that throw to Pickens, it could have been both a total disaster and the backbreaker to ND had PI been called. I was honestly a little surprised Pickens didn’t make the catch anyways.
    considering Notre Dame has no running game I have a lot of new respect for Ian book
    I thought people overreacted to the LSU game last year but to hear the angst from a win against a top 10 team is pretty funny. Maybe this game exposed the chinks in our armor but it also has the same probability of being the crucial lessons learned that a very talented team and it’s coaching staff need for later in the season. I’ll start worrying if we struggle against what’s looking more and more like a weak sec east.

    Like

  26. DawgByte

    Very good synopsis, Senator.

    In terms of missed blocking assignments, you can add Charlie Woerner to your list. He really struggled on the blocking front and almost caused a TO by laying the ball down. In summary, not a good night for Charlie.

    A lot of talk circling our coaching performance on Saturday. To say it was inadequate doesn’t begin to tell the story. A ominous trend that’s carried over from 2018 is questionable personnel rotations. You eluded to it in one of your bullet points. I’ll add another one. I’m not a fan of this rotation between Cade Mays and Ben Cleveland. The OL is simply better when Big Country is manning the line. I’m shocked Pittman didn’t slide Mays to LG when Kindley went down. Shaffer came in and immediately caused a costly penalty! Lastly, this play not to lose mentality has cost us in the past and will catch up to us again in the future. Unlike most, I didn’t object with Kirby’s decision to kick a field goal instead of going for it on 4th. However, this trend of not going for it on 4th and short yardage is indictment on Pittman’s group. Kirby clearly doesn’t have the confidence in this OL moving people off the line. Certainly not what we expected. If Pittman goes back and looks at all four game films during the break, he’ll see why this group is struggling. Here’s a hint: PAD LEVEL!!! Get down and fire off the ball boys! Good defenders are getting up underneath our guys and standing them up.

    Like

  27. Spike

    That ND Tight End, Kmet(?) was a beast! And we need better punting.. Sheesh..

    Liked by 1 person

  28. Dawg in Austin

    Fromm, Reed and Swift. The stars won the game when the OL wasn’t up to snuff, Coley was too conservative (perhaps one led to the other), and our special teams stunk outside of Specs.

    I agree on LeCounte, outside of him stripping Wilson of his pick and almost giving the ball back to Notre Dame.

    Crowder may be improved on run fits and chasing sideline to sideline, but his recognition of and backtracking coverage with the TE drag route is woeful.

    I have to also say the over-refereeing and CBS timeouts almost sucked the life out of the stadium. Almost. Had a blast, my first time in Sanford since 2013 and can’t wait for Jacksonville. Good job, alma mater.

    Liked by 1 person

    • LakeOconeeDawg

      On LeCounte. I was thinking he was having his best game minus the interception snafu with Wilson until the 1st and 10 play with 4:48 left. We brought a corner blitz (#14 Daniel ) and Richard had Kmet but was looking in the backfield and let him run right past him for a big play down inside the 20. Now….Kmet ran by a lot of guys so there’s that.

      Like

  29. tbia

    Here’s one for the smartest group in the DawgNation….

    Is JR Reed the best transfer we have ever had? I think Jarvis is in the discussion, and will end up with more honors…but I don’t know.

    Like

  30. Aladawg

    I’m curious why would not have at least lined up and tried to draw ND offside on that 4th & 1. It had worked earlier. If we get a delay Rodrigo is still money. I still go for it. Even if we don’t make it, it’s a 2 possession game. Make it and the final is 27-10 and the whole world looks at this different. Either way our talent is there and we will improve a lot from this tough test.

    Like

  31. Union Jack

    September win vs a Top 10 opponent is an A+. The details won’t matter much come selection time unless ND falls off the map and/or we pick up more than 1 loss in SEC play.

    Like

  32. Bulldog Joe

    With Stokes and Campbell out, I expected Notre Dame to challenge Georgia’s backup corners DJ Daniel, Divaad Wilson, and Mark Webb with the deep ball. Not sure why it didn’t happen. ND burned a lot of clock throwing underneath in their two-minute offense.

    That said, the depth and communication in the defensive backfield is very good, considering Georgia has a new DB coach and DC. Tackling short of the sticks was a difference-maker in the second half. No doubt Kirby is very involved in this aspect of the team.

    Last night was a great demonstration of why recruiting and maintaining a full roster and playing a lot of people early is the difference in building a championship team, especially along the offensive line and in the defensive backfield.

    Georgia is well-positioned this year.

    Like

  33. Bobs Ur Uncle

    I’m going to get crucified, but I’ve gotta say it. Swift is a wonder in the open field, has moves that makes people look foolish. But early in games, when the defense isn’t giving an inch, I would rather see Herrien. He moves people, carries the pile forward. When is the last time Swift carried a pile forward? We need the hammer to go with Swift’s talents. Herrien? Zeus?

    Like

    • Russ

      Herrien is a grown man and I was glad to see him get some featured carries. Not sure why the others didn’t. I agree with you about him moving the pile. Swift can move it too, though. He’s low and strong. He moved the pile a couple of times when they hit him after a yard and he got 3-4.

      Like

      • Otto

        Herrien is slightly better at moving the pile. Swift is better in the open field. If we’re playing mob ball move the pile early in the game I’ll take Herrien and then Swift can break big runs later. Herrien’s pass catching skills are also underrated by most. So it isn’t like he isn’t versatile.

        Like

  34. Uglydawg

    SEC officials did the game when it was at ND. They went out of their way to show they weren’t biased towards Georgia…even to the point of almost costing the Dawgs the game (Thankful for instant replay in that one)
    ACC officials did the game in Athens. Do you think they reciprocated or do you think they gave some favor (illegal receivers downfield, PI, and I too thought a targeting hit on Fromm’s late run…and a failure to call unsportsmanlike conduct after the second phoney injury by ND) to ND which kept them in the game?
    I honestly don’t expect officials to help Georgia. I just wish we could have one big game where they didn’t screw Georgia. Just one..O-N-E. Please.
    (Maybe it was the Rose Bowl??)
    I’ll hang up and listen.

    Like

    • Otto

      Didn’t OU have the call against the UGA D for allowing their full body weight land on the QB during the sack. The only time I can remember a defender being called for such a penalty.

      Like

      • Uglydawg

        The first time ever for a penalty to be called for “jumping’ against a FG attempt was called on Georgia against AZ ST years ago.
        If you’ve read this blog for very long you’ll know that I’m OCD about biased to cheating refs. Yeah..I obsess about it. It keeps me awake at night. I’ve even considered changing my handle/moniker to “Penelope Wagers is an A’hole”.

        Like

    • Macallanlover

      I thought the officiating was pretty good in terms of fairness. Outside PI which no one can get right, or ever satisfy any known fan base, they were consistent and balanced, imo. The whole tin foil movement on refs is strange to me. Yeah, Wages was immoral and a small, small man, should have just been fired by Shaw….who should have been fired for not firing Wages. The Big 14 crew in the MNC game should never get another assignment, but I don’t think it was a conspiracy, just incompetence. (I admit given they worked for Delany from Chicago, perhaps a quick check of their finance records would have made since. I still have no idea how any one blow an offsides call that wasn’t within one yard of being close.)

      Like