“I think we’ve seen what we needed to see here.”

Matt Hinton is unstinting in his take on Stetson Bennett’s ceiling against Alabama.

… Going back to last year’s regular-season loss in Tuscaloosa – a game that ended with an identical final score, 41-24 – Bennett has thrown 5 interceptions in the past 2 meetings, 4 of them with the Bulldogs trailing in the second half.

Bennett was hardly Georgia’s only problem, nor, on a day when the running game made no impact, wide receivers generated no separation, and the defense got exposed at every level, was he necessarily the biggest. Still, it’s clear enough that as long as he’s in the lineup, the Bulldogs will always struggle to win games that deviate from a defensively-driven script that Alabama has no interest in playing along to.

In stark contrast to Young, Bennett offered very little in the way of downfield juice and inspired even less confidence in his capacity to transcend the team’s larger issues. He connected on 1 attempt beyond 20 yards, an early jump ball to George Pickens that gained 37 yards and set up UGA’s first touchdown, and didn’t threaten the Tide deep again.

Like me, though, Hinton doesn’t see the ultimate issue being with Bennett himself, but with Kirby Smart.

Obviously, Kirby Smart is not paid $7.1 million a year to be obtuse about the most important position on the roster. On the contrary, he’s made quarterback a priority, signing 5-star or borderline 5-star prospects in 4 of the past 6 recruiting cycles and pursuing Daniels and Jamie Newman on the transfer market to bridge the gap until the heir apparent, true freshman Brock Vandagriff, is ready to take the reins in 2022 (if Daniels leaves early) or ’23. And yet here he is, again: On the losing end of a big game in which his team was outgunned in a career-making performance for the other side’s star QB, while arguably the most talented signal-caller on his own depth chart remains nailed to the bench.

After the game, Smart described the loss as “a wake-up call,” and technically he didn’t rule out the possibility of making the switch to Daniels while reiterating his confidence in both quarterbacks. At the end of the day, though, nothing in his answer or his track record suggests the status quo is likely to come under serious scrutiny between now and New Year’s Eve. Why would it, when it’s already carried him this far? But there is still time to wake up before the next big opportunity, and in the wake of the latest reality check there’s more urgency than ever. In the aftermath of the wipeout in Atlanta, how the Bulldogs got here is just a story. What matters now is the hard decisions they’re willing make to give themselves the best chance to go all the way.

I forget who said it, but somebody once put forth the proposition that other things being equal, rematches favor the original loser, because that’s who has the incentive to change strategy, while the winner typically sticks with what worked the first time around.  I have this ominous feeling that Kirby Smart is really tempted to eschew that and double down on what got him where he is this season.  If that’s the case, I suppose the wake-up call is for players only.

And if that’s where things wind up, with the same results, I don’t think Georgia fans are going to vent their frustration in Stetson’s direction.  He’ll just be playing the hand Smart dealt him.

96 Comments

Filed under Georgia Football, Strategery And Mechanics

96 responses to ““I think we’ve seen what we needed to see here.”

  1. munsonlarryfkajim

    All this talk of a rematch. I don’t think we are going to beat Michigan. So in a sense I think Alabama will in fact beat us twice but will only play us once

    Liked by 1 person

  2. uga97

    When it comes to us losing to elite passing teams, seems we haven’t been able change strategy. Anyone know why?

    Like

  3. 79dawg

    To me, that’s what all the harumphing about Stetson vs. JT really comes down to….
    Kirby built this team on defense first, and then he built an offense that suits that defense’s game. Blaming Stetson, when Kirby’s defense got its doors blown off in the second quarter and puts Stetson in a big hole, or suggesting that we just have to (and can!) switch quarterbacks on a dime and put offense first, are both D-U-M propositions.

    Liked by 4 people

    • We must do something…harumph!

      Liked by 4 people

    • You can definitely blame the defense for digging the hole. You can also blame the offense for making it deeper when we went 3 and out in consecutive possessions in the 2nd quarter. You can definitely blame the offense for not filling it in.

      Liked by 3 people

      • Ding. Ding. Ding. You cannot go 3 and out after a Bama score. You HAVE to burn some clock and get things figured out.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Doggoned

        As I recall, those three-outs were primarily caused by what should’ve been simple pass completions going awry. Drive-killing mistakes. CTM’s offense (in my uneducated view) works perfectly when the short passes are virtually automatic. As good as a run, usually for more yardage. Second-and-short offers up a lot more options than second-and-10 or third-and-long. The offense started off okay against Bama, but in the second quarter began a long stretch of self-killing it’s own drives. Just my observation.

        Like

    • dawgman3000

      It’s a D-U-M proposition to think this team was going win it all because of the defense. Especially considering that we knew that the secondary was the weakest link of the team. If you actually believed that we weren’t going to have outscore a team or two to achieve the ultimate prize, then you don’t follow college football very closely.

      Liked by 3 people

    • Anon

      Isn’t our 2022 class loaded with defense players? Or I’m jus not remembering correctly?

      Like

    • RangerRuss

      Saban and Bama had a say in the whole fuckn disaster. Kirby needs to come up with a better plan.
      #earnyerfucknmoneyboy

      Like

  4. sniffer

    In the aftermath of the wipeout in Atlanta, how the Bulldogs got here is just a story

    Remember August with its talk of a thin secondary and o-line made of turnstiles? Also, receivers room had been bolted shut due to not having any conference-level talent available? Raise your hand if you were sure we would beat Clemson and end the season 12-0. Point is, it’s a hell of a story, this 2021 season.

    Liked by 11 people

  5. Geezus

    Kirby then would be Richt-on-steroids, way too good of a coach to let go, but one that is always the bridesmaid i.e. can never close the deal. THAT would be the most Georgia thing ever.

    Liked by 3 people

  6. All I know is this. If Stetson trots out there for the first series against Michigan I am going to turn my TV off.

    Liked by 2 people

  7. beatarmy92

    That was the worst coaching performance by Kirby to date. The defense was not ready to play. The defensive calls were dumbfounding. Players busted coverages, and nobody got pressure. 24 points in a single quarter where nobody looked like they knew what to do. And he left SBIV in there who’s proven he can’t bring a team back from a big deficit.

    I have no confidence the he will change anything of significance. We’ll see. I hope I’m wrong.

    Liked by 9 people

    • Geezus

      I agree, the defense was just baffling. Time and again, receivers running free with no one within 15 yards. I can see a busted coverage happening now and then, but on every play?!?!

      Liked by 1 person

  8. gandle1227

    I have never been on the Stetson “feel good” bandwagon, for one simple reason. He does not meet the standard that CKS himself set for this team: “you’re either elite or you’re not.” Stetson is not elite, period. So, CKS started to come up with a “new” standard — just for the QB position — “consistency”. When you change your standard to fit another narrative, it almost always leads to bad results.

    Liked by 9 people

    • spur21

      That may all be true, but it doesn’t account for the issues (injuries) that developed over the course of the season. IMHO Kirby did a great job dealing with issues out of his control resulting in a PERFECT season.

      I’m still enjoying the ride and will continue to support the team and coaching staff. Kirby ain’t stupid regardless of the whiner’s talking points.

      Liked by 8 people

    • What if UGA doesn’t have an elite QB on the roster?

      Like

      • gandle1227

        That would obviously be a worse, and more confounding problem for a program like ours. JT was undefeated last year. JT was picked by CKS and staff to be the starter in preseason camp. Now, he can’t beat out a walk-in? Hmmm…..

        Liked by 3 people

      • Fine then, but has Kirby actually said that Stetson is our best QB on the roster and gives us the best chance to win? If he did, I must have missed it. He took JT to SEC media days for crying out loud. JT started against Clemson. I’m a Kirby fan through and through but this one has me frustrated. I don’t get it. When JT didn’t come out in the 2nd half last Saturday I decided to drink more because I knew what was coming and figured it would hurt less drunk.

        Liked by 8 people

        • godawgs1701

          The next time Kirby tells the transparent truth in a press conference will be the first time, at least as far as addressing negatives about the team. He simply doesn’t believe he has an obligation to tell fans how he makes these decisions and what all the factors are. So, he certainly has never said Stetson is our best QB on the roster. He’s never really said anything of substance about the situation other than updates about JT’s injury situation which have always been after the fact. To that point, if JT is still dealing with any kind of an injury or a deficit in his comeback, we likely aren’t going to find out until after Georgia’s last game.

          Liked by 1 person

        • originaluglydawg

          You should have stopped with “Fine then”, because that answers the question. And it is the reality.
          As much as you hard heads want Kirby to birth an elite QB before we play MI, it isn’t going to happen.
          Is it Kirby’s lack of foresight that got us here? That’s the question we need to answer.
          But bitching and moaning because he won’t play a card he doesn’t hold is just beating a dead horse.

          Liked by 4 people

          • Hard heads like you think you need Jesus Christ at QB to beat Saban, but that has been proven to be false just recently. We don’t need an elite QB, but we can’t beat him with Stetson and THAT has been proven now twice.

            Liked by 4 people

            • spur21

              Yeah, Stetson missed every tackle and allowed their WR’s to run free. Stetson has his warts, but he is the one we have been forced to dance with.

              Liked by 1 person

      • originaluglydawg

        Let’s see if you get an answer from the simple minded “Play Tom Brady now!” crowd.

        Liked by 2 people

      • JT is dressed and every tv sideline shot shows him engaged, supportive and consultative with Bennett. He’s done some mop up duty. They spoke of his injury and rehab and now that’s gone silent. If he was elite and for whatever reason is now less so, he’s still being treated as our #2 QB (Beck is not ready for prime time). Monken is very much a part of this decision.

        Occam’s Razor…Stetson is winning the battle in practice and took this team to 12-0. Kirby never confronted the decision to switch. The “get JT more time in mop-up duty” crowd don’t want to accept that’s not how it works. We didn’t have our #2 starting the last half of the season. Stetson was the starter so no need to get JT ready to be #1 again. Daniels played and practiced at the #2 role.

        So the first time Kirby faced a need to rethink the QB order was in the heat of battle, down 2 TDs early in the 3rd Q of the SECCG vs Bama. His decision to leave Stetson in tells us all we need to know…we have ONE starter and a really good backup. His starter stayed in. We may want/wish/fantasize/be certain Daniels is superior, but the two coaches who KNOW the true answer played it the way they see it every day.

        For whatever reason, JT is not elite right now. I’m sure Kirby would love to get him back to that status and has a month to see if he can. Until then, SBIV is our starter.

        Liked by 4 people

      • gandle1227

        ….and what would Saban have done at halftime or after the pick-six? The offense lacked juice, your QB was off, the crowd was sitting on its hands, the defense wasn’t showing up as planned, and coach needs to put his team in the best position to win. We know what Saban would do because we’ve lived it. Everything people are saying about what coaches see in practice, coach knows best, blah, blah, blah, was just as true for Tua. The team needed energy and Saban pulled the trigger. Kirby didn’t. Would we have won? Might JT have thrown picks? Would he be rusty? Who knows? But, sending him out there would have fired up the fans and the team because they know Kirby is going to take risks and do whatever it takes to try to win the game. Plus, what really would be the downside? Stetson knew he played poorly; he said so in post-game. Everyone in the building, except Kirby, knew that Stetson wasn’t going to lead the team to a come from behind win.

        Liked by 4 people

      • spur21

        A very valid point. I do think we have some young guys on the roster and what appears to be a stud coming in so there is hope.

        Like

      • That would suck. But he has a QB on the roster who beat mailman out in the string and summer and who started against a nasty Clemson defense that would have rolled bennett up.

        Liked by 1 person

        • This is the summary of it. It was clear Daniels was the starter from the beginning. He went to Media Days. Kirby talked about what JT had done to lead the team in the offseason. He went out against Clemson with most of his passing targets on the shelf and played a solid game. He started and played well in the South Carolina and Vandy games after SBIV replaced him for the lat injury. If you remember, SBIV came into both of those games and threw picks. Daniels has another injury and then never sees the field for a meaningful snap the rest of the season.

          It’s weird and we’re never going to get a forthright answer. The tell-tale sign will be Monken’s action at season’s end.

          Liked by 1 person

    • mongodawg

      I guess all this talk about JT > SBIV assumes JT is available to play. Im not into coach bashing – as much as I loved Richt I have to admit that Kirby has transformed UGA football into something we all thought it should be. I just think there is more to the “JT not playing” story than Kirby just being stubborn and wanting consistency.

      Liked by 1 person

  9. gandle1227

    Stetson was really bad on Saturday. He was bailed out on a jump ball to Pickens. He underthrew all of his deep balls. He should have been picked on the fourth play of the game. He threw into double coverage. He was indecisive. He didn’t run when he should have. He couldn’t throw a slant pass all night. He threw low and high to Bowers, who really helped to pad Stetson’s stats. And, he single-handedly caused a 10 or 14-point swing in the game.

    Liked by 9 people

    • I mean, besides everything you just listed he did great…(rolls eyes)

      Liked by 2 people

    • originaluglydawg

      Did you see the perfect throw dropped in the endzone by one of our receivers on the last play of the third quarter?
      You left it out. It was an incompletion.

      Like

    • James A Mercer Jr

      Brilliant analysis by a biased, incompetent clod who hasn’t been in the “arena” and sits on his couch and pontificates brilliant blurbs while consuming glasses of Jim Beam to lubricate his twisted mind. Asshole, just read your blurb and ask yourself: Do I understand this game or just pull my analysis out of my ass?

      Like

  10. Like I said yesterday. AL controlled the LOS most of the game on both sides of the ball. AL receivers were mostly running wide open while UGA’s were mostly blanketed. Reverse those two things and the score reverses as well.

    Liked by 3 people

  11. classiccitycanine

    I thought Kirby saw the light after LSU. It turns out he just upgraded his playcalling. He’s just as conservative as ever. Bennett is just the symptom of Kirby’s real problem–he’s still trying to win with a (modified) 2011 formula. Kirby is the only one in the building who needs a wake-up call. Will Kirby hear it? I guess we’ll know on Dec. 31.

    Liked by 6 people

    • originaluglydawg

      If the offensive line could have run blocked a little better and if the defensive scheme was even slightly more realistic, the game was winnable. These things can be fixed. Finding an elite QB where there are none can’t be fixed.

      Liked by 1 person

  12. W Cobb Dawg

    It’s the realization that we’re never gonna have a QB who can light it up. Kirby wants caretakers.

    Even an OC like Monken, who can run an explosive offense with the best of ‘em, is gonna be held in check.

    Liked by 3 people

    • godawgs1701

      I’ve seen this take a whole bunch of times but it’s incorrect. Stetson Bennett isn’t a caretaker. Between the two players, Stetson is the risk taker. He’s the gun slinger. He’s the interception waiting to happen. JT doesn’t take half the risks that Bennett does. Which isn’t to say that JT doesn’t also have huge upside, but the decision to go with Bennett wasn’t made because Kirby wanted to play it safe. Maybe it was the safer call to go with the guy who had momentum and rhythm, but it certainly wasn’t the call to go with the guy who had the safer player personality.

      Liked by 2 people

      • classiccitycanine

        “Maybe it was the safer call to go with the guy who had momentum and rhythm…”

        This is exactly what we’re criticizing. When Eason and Daniels got hurt, they never got their job back because Kirby was too scared to let them work out the rust–even in garbage time. As long as the backup stays in rhythm (which is easy to do when you don’t have to throw a lot and the rest of the team is overpowering opponents), that’s the safest option on a week to week basis. That’s how you end up giving a whole season worth of reps to the lower-ceiling guy who can’t get it done in the postseason and lost the competition in fall camp.

        Liked by 3 people

        • classiccitycanine

          On a deeper level, Kirby’s QB decisions are a reflection of his play not to lose offensive philosophy. He still thinks that the offense’s role is to methodically get a big lead, and run out the clock. That’s not the formula that beats Bama. In the postseason, the only teams that beat Bama are the ones who successfully throw it 35-40+ times. If you’re building an offense to beat Bama, then Stetson never becomes a real option. He’s only a real option because Kirby only asks for 20ish passing attempts per game from the QB.

          Liked by 4 people

          • James A Mercer Jr

            Just a couple of observations: Didn’t Saban’s team lose to a backup qb from Spring Hill, Georgia? And, didn’t Stetson’s stats include a 300+ passing game with three touchdowns? That used to be considered an excellent performance by a qb! So, what was the difference in his not wining? Could it have been all the other factors: defensive secondary, fron defensive seven, offensive line, inability to get separation by recivers??? Pershaps the anti-SBIV crowd should reanalyze the cause of the defeat?

            Like

            • classiccitycanine

              The value of a 300+ yard game is significantly reduced when you throw interceptions, pick-6s, and blow red zone opportunities. There’s really no need to re-analyze. The defensive shortcomings have been noted plenty of times, and yet with a good QB, we could have rallied. The opportunities were there and Stet failed. If Bama had held onto those other two interceptions, including an additional pick-6 would you be so generous to Bennett?

              Like

  13. JaxDawg

    The hopelessness is getting a little out of hand, folks.

    Before the Bama game, the dawg nation was in awe of the overall coaching job CKS had done in turning in a historic regular season (especially considered the assumed strength -offense- was hobbled by injuries most of the year, and the assumed question mark- the defense- turned out to be so dominant).

    Did it ever occur to those who are ready to burn down the program that maybe…just maybe…the fact that it took one of the other most talented teams in football to expose some weaknesses (ya know…those ones we knew about pre-season but left in the dust bins of our memory after a shockingly good regular season) is evidence of a really good coaching job throughout the year?

    This posture that the whole world can see the obvious answers, and CKS can see it too but just refuses to implement it just doesn’t add up.

    As other have stated above and in previous posts, this idea that JTD is the better option and CKS doesn’t want to use him is illogical. Just because we don’t know the reason doesn’t mean there isn’t one. Remind yourself of how the coach who adheres to “competition all the time in practice” uncharacteristically said “this is JTs team” before fall camp started, and allowed a less than 100% JTD to get us through the opener.

    For those who insist they know the team isn’t behind JTD, remind yourself of the summer workouts JTD led, and all the praises coming from JTDs team mates.

    For those of you insisting that CKS “just hasn’t learned,” remind yourself of how often CKS has pointed out how critical explosive plays are and how “he just wants to score more points.”

    For those of you who think that CKS “just can’t handle the QB position,” remember; he stuck with Fromm over Eason, and was 1 busted coverage away from a national championship. It’s hard to argue that choice. And on the Fromm/fields situation, remember it was
    when fields was a freshman, and this was following a magical 2017 season, and the Fields we saw for OSU had an additional
    2 years of experience under his belt, and would have been QB1 here with a little more patience.

    I am not saying there isn’t anything to criticize. I am not saying that the coaching job in the SECCG wasn’t somewhere between puzzling and dumbfounding. But this idea that CKS just can’t coach, or can’t see the value of a good qb is fueled more by emotion and recency bias than by evidence.

    The senator posed the right question – perhaps Kirby is just playing the hand he was dealt in the qb situation. To each their own, but I believe CKS has had some bad lick with his QB hand. CKS, who bleeds red and black, is playing that hand the best he can and will eventually get us to the promised land. Have some faith, folks.

    Liked by 8 people

    • originaluglydawg

      This is a great post, JaxDawg.
      But the Dead Horse Beaters’ Club isn’t going to be convinced.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Great comments. The other incredible delusion by some is the belief that JT can just walk on the field and score 40+ on Bama. WTF? THAT was not going to happen to the Bama D in that game. All the blame is on Stetson vs. all the praise to the Bama D who Shut. Us. Down.

      Meanwhile, the greatest D of all time watched Bama receivers and Young race by them like they were watching a parade of Shriners on mini motorcycles.

      Liked by 2 people

    • californiadawg

      This comment should be pinned atop every thread for the next 3 weeks.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Excellent post. Coaches may change but the narrative never does. If CKS (or CMR depending on the year) doesn’t do whatever the armchair coaches think should be done, it’s because he is too stubborn and would rather lose than change his mind/direction/whatever. It was a ridiculous assumption then and an even more ludicrous take now. Yes, Georgia was outcoached on Saturday by the GOAT, but that doesn’t extrapolate to “he’ll never learn from the experience” or that he hasn’t done wonders with the hand that was given to him this season.

      Liked by 1 person

    • mongodawg

      Amen Brother!

      Like

    • James A Mercer Jr

      To add to your astute observations: Wasn’t CKS just voted the SEC Coach of the Year????

      Liked by 2 people

  14. Corch Irvin Meyers, Former Jags Corch (2021)

    Kirby could have hired Briles or Lebby, but hired Monken because he was pro-style and fit Kirby’s risk-adverse offensive wants, and now he has forced Monken to run the ball more than he throws for the last two years. In Monken’s entire career as a play caller, he’s only done that once before this year.

    He stuck with Stetson Bennett “because of his legs,” meaning he doesn’t go back to the QB who has proven he can win a shoot out, he sticks with the guy who can keep the chains moving slowly and steadily by running the ball. Stetson hasn’t really been the “gun slinger” much this year as someone else described him because he’s only throwing about 19 passes per game BY DESIGN.

    These moves are all conservative, play not to lose decisions by Kirby.

    He didn’t learn anything from his mistakes in 2017 and 2018. He didn’t learn anything from getting destroyed by great QBs and offenses in 2019 and 2020. He doubled down on his play not to lose bullshit by playing more zone and not doing anything to change his offense other than find an OC who was a better fit for his new o-line coach’s preferred zone-blocking scheme, but who, when chained to Mr. Try-Hard as his QB, plays it safe and is totally unprepared to win a close game in the second half.

    I don’t think Kirby will “wake up.” That he keeps
    making the wrong choices when he’s had ample opportunity to learn from his mistakes tells me that. We’re stuck with this stubborn asshole, and that’s that. Maybe he lucks into a National Title like Mack Brown, but I can’t see more than. that. I see a lot of wasted talent in our future as Kirby continues to play not to lose.

    Like

    • Kirby could have hired Briles or Lebby…

      Dude. This may be the worst suggestion you’ve ever made here.

      If you’re gonna defend the Art Briles coaching tree — and both of them were at Baylor when shit happened — because offense, you need to find a better argument.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Corch Irvin Meyers, Former Jags Corch (2021)

        That’s a fair point, but it’s more illustrative that Kirby could have found an OC that runs a wide-open college style offense, even a dummy offense like MuLLLLen and Day run where the coaches make all the pre-snap reads and play changes for the QB, and he instead chose a pro-style play caller, albeit someone who is miles better than Chaney and Coley with more sound and innovative concepts.

        Like

        • Sounds like he made a terrible decision there. 😉

          Like

          • Corch Irvin Meyers, Former Jags Corch (2021)

            He made the wrong decision if the goal is to win a national title. If it’s to beat up on the weaklings in the East, sure, looks good to me. Monken can be more than Kirby is letting him be, but the overall offensive philosophy remains playing not to lose. I believe Monken, if let off the chain, could win a national title with his offense, but Kirby is never going to let him off the chain.

            It’s a telling stat that Monken has run the ball more the last two seasons than at any other time in his career save one solitary season. He can be more than this play not to lose conservative nonsense. He was, with freaking Brandon Weeden as his QB.

            When people say, “Why would Monken stay here if Kirby won’t let him pick the QB or run his offense,” well, look at what he done before in other places. He does what the head coach wants him to do. It’s a job. You do what your boss wants. Kirby wants to be conservative, so that’s what Monken does. His choice of Monken as opposed to OCs who only know “all gas no brakes” reflects this.

            Like

          • Corch Irvin Meyers, Former Jags Corch (2021)

            In other words, maybe Monken wasn’t the best choice for Georgia’s OC after the 2019 season. He was the best choice for Kirby. Those two things can be mutually exclusive.

            Like

        • towniedawg

          “a wide open college style offense” that erodes the defensive side of team on every team that fully embraces that pass happy scheme and spends all practice slinging the ball…No thanks, I’ll take Monken every time. Last week every the GOAT himself acknowledged his lack of recent defensive stoutness was attributed to bama’s pass happy practices.

          Like

  15. LCUGA

    I don’t normally go by “I know a guy that knows a guy” stories because I am reminded of the “believe half of what you see & none of what you hear” line from way back, BUT there’s chatter from those privvy to such chatter that we won’t see Daniels due to reasons that go beyond Xs and Os unless SBIV gets knocked TF out of a game. That’s all I’m going to say on that.
    I say that with the full knowledge that I have not attended one practice and other than being a UGA student the same time as our head coach, he and I don’t talk and that’s all I have to go on…but some things just jump out at you and don’t pass the eye test.
    What I do choose to believe, however, is that Kirby Smart can’t be stubborn enough to leave the best option on the bench for the playoffs no matter what we think.
    Beating UM won’t be easy, but I do think we beat them.
    Bama beating Cincy won’t be a cakewalk, either, but I think they beat them.
    The rematch looming will have all of us in knots for 10 days.
    Go Dawgs.

    Like

  16. HOLY SHIT!!! Derek was right (and may lighting strike me if I ever write that again). JTD’s NIL deal has the team soooo jealous they don’t support him, including the HC. How did we all miss THAT?

    Liked by 2 people

  17. gobblinglawyer

    All this damned SBIV vs. JT talk….isn’t the real question whether or not Faton Bauta has any eligibility left?

    The loss to Bama sucked but I’ll be watching the CFP regardless of who trots out there with the #1’s. It’s what we do as true Dawg fans.

    Liked by 3 people

  18. Tony BarnFart

    I buy into the zero-sum theory in the game of football……i.e. it all flows together. In other words, generically speaking, it’s more likely your ‘D’ is going to surrender whatever your magic ‘oh shit’ number is when your offense is getting stymied. And not from just a fatigue standpoint, although that is a factor. I think it’s mental and part of the momentum. When one team’s QB and offense is being had, the other teams offensive coordinator generally starts playing looser and looking for the knockout blow.

    If we get a rematch, we have got to disrupt not only Bryce Young but the whole timing.

    Liked by 2 people

  19. This is all correct. I gave Kirby a pass on Fromm over Eason and Fields (though we don’t know how 2019 would have shaken out), but he massively shit the bed on this one.

    There is no logical reason to have gone with Bennett all year, nor to shut down the passing offense when back ups came in.

    Liked by 1 person

  20. 69Dawg

    My 2 cents. Kirby blew it earlier in the season. If JT was healthy he needed to play in mop up time but with the full offensive playbook open. Instead they put him in the few times they did and he handed off on all but a few attempts. Now he has to play Bennett because he didn’t get number two game ready. Why wouldn’t you pull Bennett sooner in our blowouts. The weakest part of Kirby’s HC career is his loyalty to his QB. The Old Ball Sack would have pulled Bennett in a New York second. He would have put in JT and let him try but if he failed he would have pulled his butt too. After getting beat by his Daddy (Saban) in two games where he pulled his starter to beat us, Kirby has learned nothing. I guess Kirby may have still felt that JT would get killed by Bama’s Dline but if that is the case why did he take JT out of the portal when he is a drop back passer with limited running ability. Hell who knows but If the defense plays against Michigan like they played against Bama we will not have to worry about replaying Bama or Cincy.

    Liked by 2 people

  21. rubbers going to hit the road next year when we have 2 5-star QB’s on the roster along with perhaps JT or Stetson? Smart doesn’t have a great track record of handling that situation well. Good problem to have, but still….

    Like

  22. stoopnagle

    JFC. Stetson left the field and it was 17-17 and the next time he meaningfully touched the ball it was 17-31. Fucking a.

    Like