Not your regular SEC preseason predictions, 2018 edition

Yes, yes, it’s that time again when I show my ass trying to figure out how the Southeastern Conference will shake out for another season.

Let me start by reminding everyone about the format.  Please read this so you don’t get offended as you read the rest of the post.

The format for my picks, in case you haven’t tuned into this broadcast before, hasn’t changed.

Rather than give you my predicted records, I’ll list the schools in the order they finished in the conference last year, look at areas of potential improvement and decline and assess in what direction I expect each to go by comparison to 2010.

In other words, pure seat of the pants BS.

Based on that, the teams are listed in the order of their 2017 conference order of finish.  Remember that, before you start freaking out over where a school shows up in this post.

Got that?  Good.  Now, on with the show.

SEC WEST

ALABAMA (13-1, 7-1)

  • Pros:  Obscene depth; Nick Saban and The Process; quarterback; running back; defensive front seven; great advanced stats
  • Cons:  Rebuilding secondary; replacement of both coordinators
  • Outlook:  I actually had to make a couple of changes from last year, but who am I kidding here?  If Alabama isn’t in the national title hunt when the Tide plays in the SECCG, it’ll be a complete shock.

AUBURN (10-4, 7-1)

  • Pros:  Favorable advanced stats; quarterback; staff stability; defensive line
  • Cons:  Offensive line; raised expectations; schedule
  • Outlook: This could be one of those classic cases where a team is as good or better than it was in the previous season and still have less to show for it.  That’s because of the schedule, which has the Tigers opening against Washington and playing Alabama and Georgia on the road.  On the other hand, if the offensive line doesn’t jell, Stidham showed last season he’s not at his best working under pressure.  I’m seeing three losses.

LSU (9-4, 6-2)

  • Pros:  Defense
  • Cons:  Schedule; quarterback; new offensive coordinator; receivers
  • Outlook:  The Tigers were good last season, but not great.  This offseason, they ditched an offensive coordinator and brought in a transfer quarterback to run the offense.  Not exactly a recipe for success and that schedule, which opens against Miami and has Florida and Georgia as the crossover division games, is brutal.  I could see as many as six losses in the regular season, but I’ll hedge my bet and say a repeat of 8-4 looks more likely.

MISSISSIPPI STATE (9-4, 4-4)

  • Pros:  Quarterback; running back; defensive line; overall starting experience
  • Cons:  Special teams; depth; staff turnover
  • Outlook:  One thing Mullen did well in his time at MSU was manage the roster and Moorhead stands to benefit from that quite nicely this season.  The Bulldogs inhabit the SEC West, but the rest of the schedule isn’t as daunting.  I don’t think they’ll do worse than last season’s four losses and may very well wind up being one of the season’s more pleasant surprises.  Let’s say 9-3.

TEXAS A&M (7-6, 4-4)

  • Pros:  Running back; linebacker; special teams
  • Cons:  Secondary; special teams; schedule; staff change
  • Outlook:  TAMU plays Clemson and Alabama in the first four games of the season.  Ouch.  Auburn and Mississippi State are road games.  Ouch again.  Combine that with Fisher changing the offense and the inevitable personnel misfits that go along with that, and it’s hard to see the Aggies taking a huge leap this season.  7-5 looks about right as a regular season projection.

OLE MISS (6-6, 3-5)

  • Pros:  Terrific passing game
  • Cons:  Deteriorating team depth; defensive front seven; special teams
  • Outlook:  Give ’em credit — the Rebs could have collapsed last season, but managed to win six.  They’ll be fun to watch, as a bad defense and great passing attack is the perfect recipe for shootouts.  The conference schedule is a problem in that the most winnable games are all on the road.  That’ll wind up costing them another win over last year’s total.

ARKANSAS (4-8, 1-7)

  • Pros:  Schedule; experience
  • Cons:  Scheme change on offense and defense; offensive line; defensive back seven
  • Outlook:  A bad team looking to get better, but, again, you’re looking at a bad personnel fit for what the new staff wants to do.  I know Ian Boyd says that Chad Morris has enough to work with offensively, but I look at the mess on the offensive line and wonder if that’s really the case.  A favorable schedule helps, but not that much.  6-6, tops, and 5-7 more likely.

SEC EAST

GEORGIA (13-2, 7-1)

  • Pros:  Offense; special teams; coaching stability; best talent base in the division; schedule
  • Cons:  Depth on the defensive line; pressure of high expectations
  • Outlook:  The schedule is manageable.  The talent level is exceeded only by Alabama’s, and not by much.  Mentally and emotionally, though, Georgia is in uncharted territory.  This is where we’ll find out if Kirby Smart passes his next coaching test.  My bet is he does and Georgia loses no more than one regular season game.

SOUTH CAROLINA (9-4, 5-3)

  • Pros:  Quarterback; wide receiver; schedule; special teams
  • Cons:  Offensive line; linebacker; secondary; turnover regression to the mean; new offensive scheme
  • Outlook:  Boom’s improved the talent level and you have to respect the way the ‘Cocks clawed their way to nine wins last season.  I do believe the hurry up will pay benefits down the line as it likely suits Bentley’s game better.  Deebo Samuel’s return is a major plus.  So what makes me hesitate?  Two things.  One, there are bound to be growing pains as the new offensive scheme is put in place and two, that +11 in turnover margin did a lot of heavy lifting in 2017.  I don’t see more than eight regular season wins for South Carolina and I feel somewhat shaky about that.

KENTUCKY (7-6, 4-4)

  • Pros:  Benny Snell; coaching stability; schedule
  • Cons:  Wide receivers; quarterback; defensive line; special teams
  • Outlook:  The best thing UK has going for it this season?  The East, generally speaking, is in recovery mode.  Kentucky will win five or six regular season games because that’s what Kentucky does.  Just don’t expect it to be pretty.

MISSOURI (7-6, 4-4)

  • Pros:  Receivers; offensive line; quarterback; special teams
  • Cons:  Defensive back seven; Derek Dooley
  • Outlook:  There are a lot of nice parts back on offense.  The question is how competent the new offensive coordinator is.  Defense won’t be pretty.  One thing that’s gone below the radar is that this is a tougher schedule than we usually see Mizzou play.  For one thing, there’s Alabama on the road.  For another, they probably shouldn’t sleep on Purdue at Purdue in what might be a very entertaining matchup.  If I felt better about SOD, I could see as many as eight wins.  Let’s hedge and say 7-5.

FLORIDA (4-7, 3-5)

  • Pros:  Running backs; a QB-whispering head coach; defensive back seven
  • Cons:  Special teams; quarterback
  • Outlook:  They can’t be any worse than they were last year.  It’s not unreasonable to expect Mullen to get more out of the quarterback position than they got last season, but there’s only so much lipstick in the world to paint on that pig.  They don’t have one of the more favorable cross-division schedules and they finish at FSU.  Still, there are parts to work with and Mullen is good at getting as much as he can out of what he’s got.  I expect the Gators to double their 2017 win total.

VANDERBILT (5-7, 1-7)

  • Pros:  Coaching stability; manageable conference schedule; returning starters on offensive line and quarterback
  • Cons:  Defense; special teams; lowest talent level in the conference
  • Outlook:  Derek Mason knows how to coach defense, so how come Vandy will be better on offense than defense this season?  And who thought scheduling a road game at Notre Dame was a good idea?  It’s gonna be a real stretch for the Commodores to win five games again in 2018.  They’ll be back in the SEC East basement.

TENNESSEE (4-8, 0-8)

  • Pros:  Receivers
  • Cons:  Offensive backfield; defensive front seven; staff turnover; brutal mid-season schedule
  • Outlook:    Booch out; Pruitt in.  The best thing the new staff has going for it is lowered expectations.  They’ll need all the help they can get just to get the Volunteers back to mediocrity this season.  The Vols do have their traditional November schedule going for them, but will they survive a brutal five-game stretch that starts with Florida, runs through Georgia, Auburn and Alabama and finishes at South Carolina?  Five regular season wins are likely, six tops.

47 Comments

Filed under SEC Football

47 responses to “Not your regular SEC preseason predictions, 2018 edition

  1. Bulldog Joe

    Fair assessment and always a good read, Senator.

    Aside from Baker, I still see the rebuilt secondary as a ‘Con’ for Georgia…until proven otherwise.

    Like

    • What’s wrong with Reed?

      Like

      • Dawgy1

        I actually think the secondary will be better.

        Like

      • Bulldog Joe

        I like Reed. He’s got a good pedigree and he’s fearless. He can close on the ball quickly…one of the surprises from last season.

        But some people forget he’s only played one season in the SEC and still has an upside on his coverages. He came from private school ball via the U. of Tulsa, if I recall.

        Great opportunity this season for J.R. to become a leader.

        Like

  2. Greg

    Good job…..the DL has been my concern as well. My biggest concern is losing Roquan….you just don’t, he was a difference maker. May be the best we have ever had at that position. The depth at RB is getting a little bit to scary for me also. Overall, thinks the offense improves (PPG) and the overall defense is not as good……DB group improves.

    Like

    • jrod1229

      The depth at running back is scary? 1 RB (Swift) who has shown he can be the guy (and could easily be the best RB in the nation), 2 who have shown they are more than capable (Herrian and Holyfield) and a freshman (Cook) who is getting rave reviews.

      We are in a much better position than a few years back when we lost Marshall and had to rely on Douglas to carry the rock.

      Replacing the best HS running back in the nation won’t be easy, but the depth is there.

      Like

      • Greg

        How bout getting to be scary (potentially)….better?? A lot of injuries happen at that position, probably more than any. Lose one more in that group and see where we are. I bet Smart would be the first to agree. Although Cook seems to be lighting things up in practice (reportedly), he may not be an every down back just yet…..especially if we lose another. 190 lbs (if he is even that), may be a tough way to make a living in the SEC.

        Hope we stay healthy and go injury free, but that is asking a lot…no concerns (going in) if we do. Gonna be tough to replace last year’s production at that position no matter. Last year’s tandem broke the record for a reason.

        Like

        • jrod1229

          If Bama loses their top RB what position does that leave them in? Frankly the fact that we could lose a 5 start and be OK is showing that we have depth.

          It’s the same conversation for any team is my point. We are in MUCH better shape than most.

          Like

          • Greg

            DGAS bout Bama, talking about the Dawgs….this year. Read what I posted again and maybe you will understand where I am coming from. If not…you can continue to not worry & feel confident and I will continue to feel the way I do. Neither will affect the outcome of the game/season.

            Like

    • Brandon M

      If our depth at RB is scary to you, its a good thing you’re not a fan of any other team in the country

      Like

      • Greg

        Yes….& yes. It also concerns me at QB, one goes down…does that affect our playcalling/game plan?? Shit happens, we were lucky last year with injuries.

        Like

  3. W Cobb Dawg

    Only thing I’d quibble about is tamu and mizzou getting to 7 wins. I think both struggle mightily and end up as the 2018 versions of utk and fu, but without the resulting HC change.

    Like

  4. I agree with your assessment. For our guys, I so want to say 12-0 in the regular season, but there’s going to be a slip-up somewhere along the way. Great offense, talented (but young) defense, and one BIG question on special teams (punter). We haven’t shown under this staff the ability to go on the road in the West and win (much less even play well). Therefore, I’m worried the one is going to be in Red Stick especially if the game ends up at night.

    Pros: Offensive line, QB, outside linebacker, placekicker
    Cons: Loss of R, defensive line depth, punter

    Like

    • stoopnagle

      I just don’t see the loss.

      LSU is going to have a lot of trouble moving the ball day or night. Their defense is lights out, so they’ve got a chance; but we’ve beaten them with the lesser team before and Kirby knows how to deal with Death Valley. Talent, coaching and consistency are all in our favor; they’ve got home field and that’s about it.

      I’m not buying South Carolina will stop us. It might be a 14 point game again, but we’ll answer their call (or caw – groan). I think they’ll move it, but again, you have to play defense and we can wear them out.

      Missouri? At some point they have to stop our offense, right?

      Auburn is probably the most daunting game, but it’s at home and we’ve more or less handled Auburn at home for the last 12 years. Close game, but again, all the advantages swing our way.

      Florida? The old bug-a-boo? Crazy things happen in Jacksonville. If we lose a game, despite all the advantages we have, this is the one I’m most nervous about. That’s probably just me, though; because I truly hate the Gators. Maybe we show up 7-0 after trashing Baton Rouge overconfident and don’t take it as seriously as we should. That doesn’t sound like Kirby, but 18-22 year olds are a weird bunch.

      I can’t tell if it’s my head or my heart what’s telling me 12-0.

      Like

      • I agree with you. The schedule sets up for an unbeaten regular season. I worry that a special teams snafu (think punt block), that young defense or a little rat poison gets us beat or we walk into a buzz saw like we did at Auburn last year.

        Like

        • atlasshrugged55

          On paper we should go undefeated, but like you I’m leery. My inner Munson wonders how we handle success & if we really put in the work necessary all off-season & during pre-season practice. I still cringe at off-season “happy talk” & want to see it on the field. Was that Joe Cox leading team runs down Milledge?

          How mature are we? Do we have leaders w/in the team to replace those excellent leaders from last year? Can the coaches keep everyone focused?

          Like

          • Brandon M

            If we hold off Alabama and win the Natty last year… I think your concerns would be valid. The way last season ended, IMO, this group is going to be hungrier than ever.

            Like

          • Yesterday Kirby raved about Gailliard’s leadership in the offensive line stepping in for Wynn. Of course, he mentioned Fromm as a team leader. Ledbetter was called out on the defense as well as Reed.

            Like

    • Bulldog Joe

      We won’t be playing at LSU with the division title wrapped up. There will be a lot on the line for both teams. It will be a day game as CBS has already picked it up at 2:30 CDT in October. Not saying it will be easy, but the metrics are very different this year.

      Like

  5. PTC DAWG

    Sign me up.

    Like

  6. HR

    Ack.
    I’ve been worried about the d line and I’m still worried about the d line.

    Like

    • dawgtired

      I received an email passed from friend to friend. The email was from a lucky person that got to attend the 2nd scrimmage. His notes were very encouraging. The email is too long to post in its entirety, so I pulled out some comments on the defense since that’s the area of your concern. I hope this helps…enjoy.

      The secondary finally looks like a Bama/LSU secondary. Big, long bodies and very athletic.
      The ILBs were Natrez and Monte Rice. I feel pretty good about those two. After that it was Juwan Taylor, Quay Walker, Nate McBride, Tae Crowder and I believe Channing Tindall. Quay Walker is a specimen. He looks like Rolando McClain. Maybe it’s his number. Excited about him.

      The OL is good, but the DL is really good.

      Deangelo Gibbs got most of the work with the first team at star. LeCounte was also out there a lot and I would say the first team secondary from my view was Baker, Campbell/Webb, Gibbs, LeCounte and Reed. Also getting a lot of work with the ones was Chris Smith and Eric Stokes. The second/third teams were Speed, Bishop, Poole, Brini and the others I mentioned that worked with the ones in no particular order. Tyson Campbell is impressive. I think he might start. The DBs were heavily rotated 1’s-3’s, clearly some position battles going on.
      Cox and Anderson are freaks.

      After the scrimmage I’m not really concerned with the defense

      Like

  7. Jack Burton

    By comparison to 2010?

    Interesting new take on predictions! 😜

    I love the simple “offense” in the Pros section. STACKED EVERYWHERE BABY

    Like

  8. Debby Balcer

    Does Fitzgerald being suspended affect your thinking for Miss State? He and another starter were both suspended for the first game which is a cupcake but it does make jelling as an offense harder.

    Like

  9. Biggus Rickus

    It’s been a little while since the division champs seemed so inevitable going into a season. 2009 was the last time, I think.

    Like

  10. Otto

    Who are the losses for SC? UGA, A&M, UF or Ole Miss and Clempson? If UF can beat SC I would expect them to be ~8 wins. I expect UF to be at 6-8 wins.

    Like

  11. Ken Wilkinson

    I wonder if LSU will start a 3rd string running QB against Florida. Not sure that’s been tried before.

    Like

  12. Senator, how do you decide your W/L projections (I realize that you are estimating them)? Do you actually look at each game and make a projection or are you projecting an estimated W/L total?

    Like

  13. If we get the rug pulled out from under us….yet again….I may give it up for good and just go Striper fishing every Saturday instead. Anyway, I would expect us to drop one in route to Atlanta but would not be a bit surprised if this team steamrolls everybody’s ass. I think we are going to be even bigger, stronger and faster than last year.

    Like

  14. Drew Dawg

    Was D Line depth a concern heading into last year? I thought we rotated well and other than the first Auburn game, no one could run on us. Correct me if I’m wrong, but we only lost John Atkins and Trenton Thompson (not a small loss), but replace them with guys who can rotate-in in game 1 with Jay Hayes and Devonte Wyatt.

    Like

    • Greg

      Hoping Devonte will be a terror, saw where he ran a 4.6 will in HS…that is moving out for a big man…..but you just don’t know till ya know.

      Like

  15. WF Dawg

    I know CFB is back when the Senator makes this annual post. “I find I’m so excited I can barely sit still or hold a thought in my head. I think it’s the excitement that only a free man can feel, a free man at the start of a long journey whose conclusion is uncertain.”

    Like

  16. DawgFlan

    Senator, you only show your ass once a year?
    😉

    Like

  17. I agree with you West picks.
    For the East:
    UGA
    SC If they lose to FL they will finish behind them
    UF They get both KY and MO at home
    KY They are solid but not good.
    MO UGA is the only home game they can’t win. They have a tough road schedule.
    TN They get all of their swing games at home MO, KY, FL, AL, UGA and AU aren’t winnable for them.
    Vandy AR may be their only conference win.

    Like

  18. ugafidelis

    Dad gum Tennessee’s October is brutal!

    Like