A contrarian take on the quarterback situation

It’s fair to say that most of the concern thrown Georgia’s way about keeping Stetson Bennett in the starter’s role boils down to a simple question:  is he the quarterback who can keep up with the prolific offenses Georgia will see, starting with Alabama in the SECCG?  Here’s how Bill Connelly ($$) summarizes it:

Because Georgia has coasted through this season so minimally challenged, it still feels like we don’t know everything we need to know about whether Bennett has really broken through this season. This feels like an unfair standard, but it might remain a question until the SEC championship game in Atlanta.

And hell, if Bama’s offensive line isn’t up to snuff, it could get destroyed by Georgia’s front, at which point nothing else might matter. There might not be an offense as good as last year’s Bama and Florida offenses this year, so for all we know Bennett will keep right on doing what he’s doing, and the Dawgs will be just fine. But in theory, Atlanta might still tell us something.

On that last point, he’s right.  If Georgia’s defense is that generational, all this quarterback talk is moot.  Georgia will win a natty no matter who comes out to take snaps.

For the sake of this post, though, let’s assume he’s not and that Georgia eventually faces an offense that can put up more points than we’ve been accustomed to seeing this season.  Well, first of all, let’s put that in perspective.  As Bill notes, there isn’t an equivalent offense in 2021 that’s a peer of 2020 ‘Bama or 2019 LSU.  Also, let’s not forget that Georgia’s defense has been pretty friggin’ spectacular.  So even if we say there’s an offense out there that exceeds expectations, it’s not like we’re going to see one put up 40+ points.

Given that, why is it unreasonable to expect Bennett to keep up?  Georgia hasn’t scored fewer than 30 points in any of his starts this season.  All of which is a roundabout way of getting around to what may be Georgia’s kryptonite if Bennett starts:  the right kind of opposing defense.  Take a look at his 2021 game log.  It tells a consistent story.  Bennett is absolutely destroying defenses that sell out to stop the run and leave him with easy pickings over the top against secondaries left to fend for themselves.  But in the two games when he faced defenses that didn’t go balls out against the run and played softer, over the top coverage against the pass, Arkansas and Florida, he turned in his two worst performances of the season.

In those two games it didn’t matter because the defense took control of both contests.  But what happens when he faces better opposition that also features a defense that can take a similar approach?  Fortunately, Georgia won’t play Georgia on the way to a championship, but there is at least one team out there that gives me some pause in that regard.

Here are the national rankings for defensive passer rating:

I hate to break it to y’all, but Cincinnati’s pass defense is good.  And before you break into a chorus of “hey, they ain’t played nobody, PAWWWLLL”, take a look at Notre Dame’s passing game log this season.

One of those passer ratings ain’t like the others.

Cinci’s defensive passing game logs over the past two seasons are remarkably consistent, and at a high level.

With one significant exception…

No quarterback has played the Bearcats’ defense as well as Daniels did in the bowl game.

I don’t know how successfully Stetson can handle a defense that can keep Georgia’s passing game in front of them, forcing him to make underneath reads carefully, be patient with what he’s being given and, perhaps most importantly, convert third downs.  Those are all areas where Daniels has a stronger game.

Now, again, maybe it won’t matter.  There aren’t many great defenses expected to make the CFP field besides Georgia’s.  Ohio State ranks 36th in defensive passer rating.  Alabama is 62nd.  Oklahoma is 112th.  Or, happily, maybe Georgia’s defense is a for the ages shut down type.  But it’s possible that whom Stetson Bennett is throwing against may matter more than who Georgia is defending.  Just a thought…

128 Comments

Filed under Georgia Football, Stats Geek!, Strategery And Mechanics

128 responses to “A contrarian take on the quarterback situation

  1. hertyfield

    Favorite post of the year Senator, thank you.

    Liked by 8 people

  2. sundiatagaines

    Well said.

    We had some extenuating circumstances with injuries. But Clemson also did not load up to stop the run, as I recall.

    Like

  3. akascuba

    If both QB’s are full go which I hope they are. I’ll trust the two guys in charge who see them practice everyday against a great defense to know who should start.

    Liked by 13 people

    • Cheer wino69

      That’s crazy talk! No way UGA coaches who have played, trained and studied the game can know more than the collective wisdom of thousands of us couch potato blog commenters.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Down Island Way

      “Because Georgia has coasted through this season so minimally challenged”, don’t know what Bill’s definition of coasted & challenged are and I’m not here to defend UGA football, they do not need my opinion for shit, will say of the games viewed in person this year UGA football is challenged every game, the plan/scheme advanced by the opposition both offensive/defensive has been met with extreme prejudice causing a retreat for plan c implementation, coasting may seem that way, in reality UGA football is any thing but coasting (it is a fun ride though)… the right tackle who is too small to fit in a uniform, that swirling wind that’s got those flags stickin’ straight out and that QB, my gawd that QB he’s just a walk on and all those injuries, they’re piling up bigger than the stadium, then we’re on the road to that place where they’re running more plays than you can count with a calculator and our long snappah outa’ that school in south Georgia is really undersized this year…

      Liked by 1 person

  4. rigger92

    Thanks for the great read. One thing that sits in my mind is speed. December will be a significant upgrade in overall team speed that we face. Makes me hope that JT is healthy because he does have a quicker trigger, gotta feed the intermediate stuff to sustain drives. (I say this as one who has no preference at QB and don’t mind the both of them playing in a game)

    Luckily we have the “steel sharpens steel” thing so that our O isn’t shocked when we get to the big games.

    Liked by 6 people

  5. moe pritchett

    This season could wind up a 2017 with a UGA flavor.
    Right now tho….I just need to Munson my 10-r-C woes. I have to work in East tennersee.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Great analysis Senator. I would note that no one they (Cincinnati) have played so far has our running back room. That coupled with a mobile quarterback may change the equation some what. One thing I know is having all of our receivers back will make a huge difference no matter who is throwing it to them.

    Liked by 2 people

    • classiccitycanine

      Our RB room did jack sh– against a defense that surrendered 7 yards per carry to Vandy the previous week. Our running game isn’t particularly scary this year because our O- Line can’t consistently run block. I think it’s a mistake to sell out against the run when you defend Georgia.

      Liked by 1 person

      • PTC DAWG

        33 for 168…5.1 ypc.

        Liked by 1 person

        • Yep. And that was with Mizzou focused on “stopping” our run, which the did sufficiently enough. UGA had the lowest per-carry average of any SEC squad thus far against them.

          Incidentally, I did notice this was the first game Mizzou has played on Grass. Maybe their DLine was simply on skates previously. Who knows.

          Either way, they proved that making UGA “one dimensional” in the direction where there are MORE playmakers is a truly horrible plan.

          Liked by 1 person

        • doubledawg09

          That is the stat line for all ball carriers. The running backs gained 106 yards on 28 carries, which is 3.78 yards an attempt. Zeus, for example, only had 14 yards on 9 carries. He also had a long of 13. Our O-line was unable to consistently open holes in the early quarters for our running backs. That is a problem that needs to be addressed, even though I love what Monken did by calling passes to take advantage of what the opposing defense was giving us.

          Like

          • PTC DAWG

            WE don’t throw it enough, wait, we don’t run it enough….D, JD.

            Like

            • doubledawg09

              It’s not a matter of not running or passing enough. The point was that the offensive line needs to improve with their run blocking on traditional handoffs to running backs. Warren McClendon said as much when he was interviewed after the game. My comment about Monken calling pass plays was simply to compliment him for calling passes when it was obvious the o-line was not able to run-block Mizzou’s front in the early part of the game. Rather than banging his head against the wall, he took what the defense gave. But that does not mean that there is not room for improvement with the o-line’s run blocking.

              Like

  7. Bluto, good work. If Cinci is the potential big bad wolf, then I’m not too concerned. If healthy, our receivers (regardless of who is QB) will be much better than what Cinci faced in last year’s bowl. Also, we have seen improvement from every other unit on the team. Plus, if we meet them in the CFP, we won’t have players sitting out, this GA team would be a juggernaut that Cinci has never seen before. Honestly, in the potential scenario you laid out…I really like our chances.

    But right now, like Moe says above, I just want to beat big Urnge…

    Liked by 4 people

    • CInci probably isn’t the only team — although I don’t think there are many out there — who can play the style of defense that would cause Stetson problems.

      Liked by 3 people

      • miltondawg

        Cincinnati is a great, feel-good story this year. They are not a great team. They are good to very good team, but not great and certainly not elite. Their win against Tulane was lackluster and they needed two goal line stands, a QB that slipped on the one yard line, and a ruled fumble into the end zone on 4th down to secure the win against the 3-6 Tulsa Hurricane at home.

        Liked by 3 people

        • My biggest complaint against Cinci is not against the team, but against the city for their claim to be the chili capital of the world…not even close

          Liked by 2 people

          • miltondawg

            No disagreement there. That being said, I was as surprised as anyone that I really, really like Skyline Chili’s 3-Way back when my in-laws lived there.

            Liked by 1 person

            • PTC DAWG

              I like chili, all kinds of chili….all kinds of toppings.

              Liked by 1 person

            • For the uninformed…it’s Greek style thanks to the heavy immigrant population in Cincy. Finely ground beef, tomato base sauce and lots of spices including cumin and unsweetened chocolate! A brown soup in consistency (think enchilada sauce) and not pepper hot. Served on small “Coney” hot dogs with chopped onion and shredded cheese or as a plate over spaghetti adding beans (added afterwards, not in the chili itself), cheese and onions for what’s called a “5 way”. An acquired taste for sure, but a great late night meal for less than McDonalds. You may find cans of Skyline Chili in Kroger owned grocery stores. One of my favorites, but very different than the bison and elk hearty chili we have here in Colorado.

              Liked by 1 person

        • Outside of Georgia, please give me a list of every team that’s gone through their schedule with no losses and no lackluster wins.

          More to the point, I used them as an example of the type of defense that might give Bennett problems. I wasn’t predicting they’d beat Georgia.

          Like

  8. mg4life0331

    Since the playoffs inception here a list of the qbs that were able to beat Bama.

    Burrows, Watson and Jones.

    I guess we’ll be the first to do it with one that might not even sign as a free agent after the draft.

    Like

  9. mg4life0331

    I just realized you used a Cincinnati team as evidence. Then used Notre Dame as “somebody
    played”.

    An annual playoff doormat that got beat by a school that’s in a conference full of homecoming teams isn’t empirical evidence no matter how you chop it up.

    Liked by 1 person

    • classiccitycanine

      That’s funny, I recall needing a long last second field goal to beat those nobodies 11 months ago.

      Like

      • mg4life0331

        You are correct. Do you recall getting out asses beat by the two best teams in our league last year? Any recollection of us beating a 4-7 Miss State team by 7 being tied in the 4th quarter?

        Just cause our division sucks doesn’t mean we kicked ass.

        Like

      • Derek

        La. Monroe beat the “genius” Saban and “big bad” bama.

        I’m sure that’s been a meaningful event in each program’s history since.

        Like

        • classiccitycanine

          Irrelevant point.

          Like

          • Derek

            That WAS my point.

            Last years game vs. Cincy?

            Who gives a rat’s ass?

            We lost to UF last year for fucks sake. It’s completely meaningless.

            Liked by 1 person

            • classiccitycanine

              I just think it’s weird to call Cincy a bunch of nobodies when they’re winning a ton of games and pushed us to the brink despite a massive talent gap in the very recent past.

              Like

              • Derek

                Whether they are nobodies or not, the Chik-fil-a bowl doesn’t matter, at all.

                Utah would NOT have beaten Alabama in a national title game had bama beaten the gators in atl and thats who they drew.

                Texas wouldn’t have beaten Georgia if we’d won the seccg.

                Bowl games can be VERY deceptive because the motivations and preparation can be so disparate.

                If you want to respect Cincy, respect them, but keep last years bowl game out of the analysis because it really is totally meaningless.

                If there is any relevancy to it, its that they won’t see Georgia and be scared. Good. It’ll take a few minutes for reality to set in then. Overall, I think that favors us because the team they saw last year isn’t what they’d see this year.

                I think that the teams that can beat us are bama and osu because they can match up along the los. If their qb plays out of their mind, we’d be in a fight. No doubt about that. I haven’t seen cincy, but their schedule and results don’t impress me a lot.

                Liked by 2 people

                • iusedtopostasmikecooley

                  Agree. “If you want to respect
                  Cincy, respect them…”. Has a Dennis Green quality. It they are who we thought they were.

                  Like

  10. biggusrickus

    To the extent I’m concerned about Bennett (and if they stifle Tennessee this weekend, I’m going to think the QB is moot), it’s because of his imprecision as much as his occasionally awful decisions. Watching the highlights of the Missouri game, you can’t help but notice how many poorly placed balls went for first downs and big plays. He threw a beautiful ball to Smith for the first touchdown, and he made a couple of nice intermediate throws. However, he was also bailed out or lucky on multiple plays. The pass to Burton was underthrown pretty badly and required a great play by Burton. The out to Rosemy-Jacksaint was only saved from being a pick by a great play. The wheel to McIntosh was way off and required an adjustment and great catch to save what should have been an easy TD throw. There was a high throw to Bowers that went off his fingertips and luckily bounced off a defender’s arm and back to him. Lastly, he threw low and to the right of Washington on what turned into a third down conversion simply because he outathleted a defender. That kind of stuff can get you beat when you aren’t 40 points better than the other team.

    Daniels didn’t look sharp, and the missed slant to Burton was every bit as bad as the stuff listed above, but that was also the only truly bad ball he threw.

    Liked by 4 people

      • biggusrickus

        Tennessee’s offense is pretty good. I won’t be surprised if they become the first to clear the 13-point barrier. They could even go over 20 if Georgia has a couple of busts in coverage.

        Liked by 1 person

        • Munsoning

          Even without AA I expect Lanning to let the Dawgs out in Kneeland. Hooker should be on the ground, running for his life, or getting hit on pretty much every play. He should be good for a couple of INTs and at least one fumble. Don’t think the passing game gets in gear.

          Liked by 1 person

          • biggusrickus

            That’s what I’m hoping for, but it’s hard to imagine a team not being threatened the entire regular season. If Tennessee doesn’t manage it, nobody is going to this year.

            Liked by 1 person

          • silvercreekdawg

            Here’s a couple of items that allow me to think UTerd won’t be a problem.

            UGA D is first in the SEC in QB sacks. UTerd O is last in the SEC in QB sacks allowed. Hell, Ole Miss rushed 3 all night and got 5 sacks of Hooker; we might get 8-10.

            UTerd’s top 2 RBs left the UK game with injuries and may not play. Even if they do, they won’t be as close to 100% as they might have been previously. I’ll take our D against any one dimensional offense out there.

            Liked by 1 person

            • Munsoning

              Awesome info, scd. Thanks. Didn’t know that the Fightin’ Lulu and Juniors were missing their top two RBs. Dawgs gonna break that D into a million little pieces.

              Like

    • These are good observations, but should we also account for the scrambling and yardage gained with his feet?

      Liked by 2 people

      • biggusrickus

        It’s something he can do that Daniels can’t, but he’s not so dangerous with his feet that it draws him even with a healthy Daniels, in my opinion.

        Like

        • I’m beginning to wonder if Todd disagrees with this take.

          Like

        • Russ

          One of the announcers (I think) relayed a point that JT gets you 2-3 more passing plays when he’s in and Stetson gets you 2-3 more running plays when he’s in. I can see a debate on the 2-3 passing plays being potentially more beneficial, but sometimes those running plays get us out of potentially negative situations, so overall I think it’s a wash.

          That said, I’d love to have a healthy and fully-rep’d JT back there if/when needed. Having both is a true luxury that I don’t think other teams have.

          Liked by 3 people

      • originaluglydawg

        Yes.

        Like

  11. classiccitycanine

    A QB that’s only good when the other team is preoccupied with defending the run is not going to take us where we want to go. We need to play JT and send Stet to his rightful bench spot ASAP. I don’t trust Kirby with QBs yet, and I’m afraid he’ll go back to his do-no-harm-offense security blanket the longer Stet plays.

    Liked by 3 people

    • mg4life0331

      I’m with you. I don’t have trust yet. That was burned in back to back seasons.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Munsoning

      With this defense the QB needs to make good decisions. Not that every QB doesn’t need to do just that, but the risk-taking and bad decision-making that results from bad pre-snap reads should be close to zero. Are Stet’s INTs and not-quite-INTs more the result of poor throws or poor choices? My dumb brain tells me the latter. JT’s seem more the former. Happy to be corrected about this.

      Like

      • Munsoning

        “Result,” not “results.”

        Like

      • Russ

        Stetson is 14/4 TDs to INTs so that’s pretty good. At some point it stops being luck and becomes execution.

        Liked by 2 people

        • Munsoning

          Definitely didn’t mean to suggest that Stet is just getting lucky. I’m probably guilty of focusing on his comparatively few bad throws rather than his good ‘uns.

          Like

      • classiccitycanine

        My issue is that people are using the defense as an excuse to let the offense settle for less than its best. We should always be developing a scary defense AND a scary offense. If the defense is as good as it appears, we need to use that margin to develop high-ceiling players like JT on offense instead of playing safe, low-ceiling game managers like Stet. It’s possible that Stet gives us the best chance to win this weekend, but he doesn’t give us the best chance to win on Jan. 10. The goal is to seize the thrown of college football, not crush the SEC East. Unlike most positions, QB can’t managed on a game-by-game basis, and that’s why I worry that Kirby is making the wrong call by playing Stet so much–assuming Daniels is healthy.

        Liked by 3 people

        • classiccitycanine

          *throne

          Like

        • Munsoning

          My dumb brain says: I’ve seen the better team lose too many CFB games to think that the Dawgs don’t need to get the O playing well enough to come back from a two- or (God forbid) three-score deficit. They’re going to have to win at least one big game while Lady Luck is giving ’em the bird and the refs are saying, “Bend over, boys.”

          Like

  12. Dawg in Austin

    Neither Cincinnati nor Notre Dame has played anyone but each other this year so comparative data against their schedules is at least fairly flawed. I’ve watched several games for each team and neither are impressive. Georgia beats them by 2 TDs at least. I still think this is an epic defense and a good offense and that should be able to take down all comers. But the end of the season is really backloaded for many teams, including Cincy, so let’s check out the data in 3 weeks and see if it changes either of our minds.

    Liked by 1 person

  13. “I don’t trust Kirby with QBs yet”
    Why? I mean are there decisions we could second guess? Yes. Is there any guarantee another decision would have been better? No.

    Liked by 2 people

  14. Previously Paul

    Well, it’s clear Kirby has decided to go with Stetson as much as possible. I hope JT is ready when we need him because I think we will. I wish we would give him more meaningful snaps in games but I ain’t getting paid to coach.

    Like

  15. ASEF

    Word of caution:

    Bama’s 2016 defense looked generational. They allowed less than 4 yards a play on the season and scored 15 TDs. Fif-freaking-teen. (No, it wasn’t on the same level statistically as Georgia’s so far).

    2 key injuries down the stretch in that season left them vulnerable to Clemson’s particular flavor of offense – and their own offense, which looked sharp all season, had a bit of an Achilles heel on 3rd down conversions when forced to pass. Both combined to derail that team in the second half of the championship game.

    Optimizing the offense builds margin for error against the unforeseen.

    And maybe optimizing the offense means Bennett optimizing his own game. I don’t know. At this point, you almost have to assume Monken prefers Bennett, for whatever combination of reasons. Reads, legs, continuity, chemistry – whatever.

    The really good news is that Georgia is the only championship contender that’s not contingent on the starting QB not getting dinged. None of the others have 2 QBs capable of getting the job done in a high-pressure environment against an elite opponent.

    Liked by 11 people

  16. Texas Dawg

    Monken has proven a master of taking what the other team gives. If they sell out to take away the run, then h’s bombs away. If they take away the explosive plays, our TE and RB have proven that they can take a short pass and make it into big yardage. I suspect by the time that we reach Atlanta, Monken will have enough data points on Stetson to maximize his strengths and minimize his weakness against whatever defense is thrown at us. It’s not like Stetson is a one trick pony that if you stop a certain play you stop the offense. It just may not look as pretty and exciting getting there.

    Liked by 6 people

  17. theotherdoug

    In the CCG and playoffs we will play better teams (duh). If I was an opposing coach I’d force UGA’s offense to run the damn ball and prove they can go the length of the field without stalling. I’d do that early before my D is tired.

    The opposing offenses need to be patient and not turn the ball over.

    Liked by 1 person

  18. Not scared of Cincy. There defense may stifle us but with their O, Kirby can put in a MuLLLLLen level of effort and still hold them to under 13. Monkey can score 24 on any defense with a healthy QB and receiver room. Bama scares me much worse because their D is decent enough to hold us to 24 and their O may be able to score 30.

    Like

  19. stoopnagle

    Well, I guess we don’t need to worry because I don’t think the committee is going to let Cincinnati in to play.

    Liked by 3 people

  20. RangerRuss

    Every Saturday is a disaster looming. The Dawgs always adjust. I’m not going to harsh my buzz worrying about shit I can’t control and most likely is much ado about nothing.

    Liked by 4 people

  21. CB

    I’ll buy that Cincinnati is the best passing defense Notre Dame has faced. It’s a harder sell that they would be the best passing defense Georgia has faced after the SECCG.

    I can’t think of any reason to believe that gleaning information from NY6 bowls is valuable. Wait… Unless Texas IS, in fact, back.

    Liked by 2 people

  22. Christopher Moore

    Georgia has on defense what Bama and LSU had on offense the last 2 years. Bryce Young is getting sacked 1 out of every 15 drop backs. That’s worse than Vandy. There is no offense that is immune to our defense.

    Liked by 4 people

  23. californiadawg

    Not concerned at this point who is QB, I just want our offense to play a 4-quarter game. We’re going on week 4 of our scripted drives going nowhere, and it taking us a quarter if not a half to wake up offensively and score points. The oline not being able to get consistent push against one of the worst defenses in the country is something I hope we improve upon Saturday.

    Liked by 2 people

  24. This shit is tiring. *If we get in a shootout…”. Against this D? And it doesn’t matter who starts at QB. If the other D is shutting down Stetson throwing (which is best down by containing him in the pocket and hands up blocking his throwing lanes) our running game should work…or we bring in JT. If JT is getting his ass blitzed off and not making them pay with quick releases, SBIV comes in to move the pocket and use his feet. My gawd…we’ve got three (!) monster TEs running around out there!

    We’ve heard opposing HC’s marvel at our D. They are not just big, but fast and deep and hit with purpose. Cincy?! Our D line will harass their QB like no other and our O will run through their DL like Skyline chili.

    We’re #1 for a reason. Our D is like having Herschel but with an even better supporting cast. No one can even decide who is #2 for a reason…there’s a big gap. Injuries and turnovers could beat us, but that’s true for the opposition. There isn’t a team we line up with tomorrow that we probably don’t have a TD or more advantage.

    JT or Stet? That’s not the question. We have both. Enjoy the ride. Seasons like this don’t happen often.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Honestly, and I mean this in a non-snarky sense, if that’s what you think, why did you even bother to read the post?

      Like

      • Because you take the effort to put it together. And the caution about Cincy is interesting if not amusing.

        ASEF brought up the better analysis of the other side of the coin here. The question is not about Stetson keeping up in a shootout. The real question is if anyone has the talent and scheme to put points up on this defense. Enough points that puts our offense into shootout mode.

        We only lose the SECCG if Saban figures something out about our D and exploits it. If we lose a CFP game we’ll be talking about turnovers, bad officiating and injuries. What I don’t think will happen is we’ll be blaming Kirby for playing Stetson.

        Like

  25. Nil Butron is a Pud

    We now live in some kind of bizzaro world where the Senator can invoke “Georgia ain’t played Georgia, PAWWWWLLL” and we all nod and think “yep, that’s where we are.”

    Gonna need to go pour a big cup of Munsoning.

    Liked by 1 person

  26. iusedtopostasmikecooley

    For the people who are determined to worry about Bennett being quarterback because of what could happen, what has almost happened, and what has happened in the past, have any of you ever been in a car crash? Did you stop driving because it could happen again, has almost happened, and happened before? You’re not being analytical and realistic. You’re being paranoid.

    Like

    • LMAO.

      If you think Smart and Monken aren’t gaming this out in their heads, you’re the one who’s not being analytical and realistic.

      Like

      • iusedtopostasmikecooley

        I believe we have a failure to communicate. I was agreeing with you and disagreeing with the people who are stuck in “We caint win with Stetson Paaaaaaaaaaawl.” And was saying so because I believe Kirby and Monken might know a thing or two that the Stetson haters don’t. But you do you big dawg.🍺

        Like

        • Sorry if I misunderstood, but my post was about what could happen… 😉

          Like

          • iusedtopostasmikecooley

            Right and what I’m saying and I guess am doing a bad job of saying it is that Kirby and Monken see all that and are gaming it out in their heads as you say. I’m agnostic on who starts and think they’ve earned the benefit of the doubt. So despite some of the comments about what Stetson almost screwed up on against Missouri, if they keep him out there I believe they have a good reason. I’m not married to the idea of either quarterback. My OP was aimed at the “We caint win with Stetson, Paaaaaaaawl! He scares me!” crowd. Enjoyed reading the post.

            Liked by 1 person

  27. Russ

    Good analysis, Senator. I agree there are ways to defend/beat Stetson as QB, just as there will be ways to beat JT as QB. Combined with this defense, it hasn’t really mattered what opposing coaches have tried. We’ve still scored at least 30 points in every game with Stetson as QB. I’d expect similar results (at least) from JT if he was in there. Monken has this offense figured out, and until someone stops it, he’s going with the hot hand. I’m not too worried about what may come, though we can certainly be beat (any given Saturday and such).

    Where I get tired of the “discussion” is from people that know for a fact that we can’t win it with Stetson. I watched the Mizzou game last week with the local Bulldog club. One guy sat there the entire game telling everyone how each pass from Stetson (either complete or incomplete) was inches away from disaster. Of course, he was silent when JT came in and had a pass batted down and another intercepted. Shit can happen when you try to throw the ball, no matter who the QB is.

    After 8 games with Stetson and a 14/4 TD/INT ratio, at some point it stops being lucky and becomes execution. Some of you are so obsessed with being right about Stet/JT that you’re missing out on enjoying the best season of Georgia football I’ve seen since 1980. Enjoy the ride people and trust Kirby, Monken and Lanning.

    Liked by 8 people

    • iusedtopostasmikecooley

      Much better job of saying what I was trying to say.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Tony BarnFart

      I’ve pretty much moved into that camp after being hard on “must play JT” for a few weeks. I think JT is going to get enough reps between practice and games that he will be ready. It’s not like we’re going to get in a situation where Stetson and the D (lol) screw it up so bad that we’re out of a game before Kirby and Monken will see if JT gives us a spark. So all you’re left with at that point is “if JT is a backup, he’s hitting the transfer portal.” Maybe, maybe not. Why worry about that shit ? QB’s, signing classes, transfer portal…….all of it is a MEANS to the END that we’re actually in the midst of. A bird in hand is worth 2 in the bush and all that jazz.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Preach it, Russ! This is the best GA football team many of us have ever seen, and maybe, just maybe they prove to be the best team to ever wear silver britches. Let’s chill out and stop worrying about being right and just be present in the moment. As Uncle Got always says, “Who got the cat pregnant?”…err I mean, “These are awesome days to be a Georgia Bulldog…come on in Bulldog nation, the water is fine”

      Get em Got, Get em!

      Liked by 2 people

    • originaluglydawg

      Nice post, Russ

      Like

  28. Louie

    Every time Kirby is asked about the qb’s he says he’ll play the one that gives us the best chance of winning. If he and Monken think that JT is better when the defense we’re playing doesn’t sell out against the run, I assume he’ll play JT in those situations. He has 3 more games to get JT ready before the playoffs and he and Monken are both aware of that. With all of the options we have on offense with healthy receivers, our tight ends and running backs, two qb’s with different strengths, an OL that has only given up 5 sacks all year, and Todd Monken at OC, I’m not worried about the offense. The defense is pretty good too. Best season ever.

    Liked by 3 people

  29. dawgphan34

    Seems clear that Daniel’s health is improving. He will continue to get better and likely creates some leverage with the offense that isnt there with Bennett.

    Bennett’s offense is known. It’s very good when paired with a defensive TD.

    It might be good enough to win every game.

    Liked by 2 people

  30. I made a call to a guy who knows a guy who has seen Monken’s play sheet. And I quote: “If in a shootout, put in whoever can put the ball in Washington’s and Bower’s hands”.

    Liked by 3 people

    • Munsoning

      Concerns me that DW0 isn’t getting the ball more often. Dude is unstoppable–except when his QB doesn’t feed him the rock.

      Like

  31. RangerRuss

    The athleticism of the Dawgs receivers bail Bennett’s ass out on a regular basis. Jacksaint ripping a sure interception from the Mizzou DB is the only reason A Smith gets the TD catch a couple plays later. His overthrow of a
    wide open Mcintosh who made a circus catch and the athleticism of the D lineman inserted to block is the only reason the Dawgs score the next series. No D lineman inserted on the next goal line series? Field goal. Bowers excellent reception prevented another interception and the direct snap to Cook, bypassing Bennett, seemed almost a desperation TD. This is against a bottom dwelling SEC team.
    The Dawgs are winning in spite of Bennett not because of him. Yeah, I appreciate his hitting the big throws and ability to run to keep the chains moving. But that’s all between some mediocre to bad QB performance. Come December and January it IS going to matter who the QB is throwing against. Hopefully who the Dawgs are defending won’t matter as much. But if the opposing D is competent they’ll be defending more often if Bennett is QB1.
    As good as the Dawgs are they’re still a work in progress. They may be good enough to win it all in spite of poor run blocking and inconsistency from the QB position. Those are the things that wake me in the wee hours of the morning along with this other shit I’m dealing with.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Nothing like a little righteous indignation at 3:30 in the morning. 😉

      Liked by 1 person

      • RangerRuss

        Ya mon. There were a lot facts to digest in your post. I had just re-watched the first half of the Missouri game without the RednBlack glasses on. Using your final paragraph as a guide and allowing perfect to be the enemy of good enough I identified SBIV and run blocking as the only real team obstacles to a perfect season. That’s amazing actually. Kirby has almost put together an all star team. Almost. It’d be a shame to see it derailed by a young man that’s obviously trying his best and getting better every game.

        Like

    • Not sure what that “other shit” you’re dealing with is, but I hope it’s nothing too serious…you’re the forearm that put Miss Brandee’s on the map.

      Like

      • RangerRuss

        That “shit” is arthritis. Paying for all the fun I had back in my day. Tylenol wears off, I wake up and get up. A few cups of coffee, stretching and I’m bright eyed and bushy tailed for the dawn. You know, when the French and Injuns attack.
        Remember this young man, gravity is not just a good idea. It’s the law.
        Whine off.

        Liked by 1 person

  32. Pingback: TFW a stopgap turns into a foregone conclusion | Get The Picture