Moving, to Montana

What player compensation is to many of you, conference realignment is to me.  Anathema.

Realignment has proven itself to be a money-grubbing chase that’s destroyed some of the classic rivalries of my youth, like Oklahoma-Nebraska, stretched conferences in absurd geographic attempts to add television markets regardless of the mediocrity they’re forced to absorb (well played, ACC and Big Ten) and created a scheduling mess in the SEC that the conference is still struggling with almost a decade later.

But Jim Delany did earn a $20 million bonus, so there’s that.  But I digress.

Anyways, I don’t know if it’s because of Connecticut’s move back to the Big East (a rare example of a conference jump driven by basketball rather than football) or that it’s simply July, or, more likely both, but there’s been plenty of pundit chatter about realignment of late, perhaps headlined by it being featured at The Athletic.

I’ve ignored most of it, because it’s a dreary subject for me, but then Stewart Mandel had to weigh in on the future of realignment ($$) and I couldn’t resist because I was curious what he might have to say about the Georgia program, which, as we all know, never has quite measured up on the national stage in Mandel’s opinion, forged as it is in the wisdom of 100 random Montanans.

Well, I have good news of a sort for you.  Georgia is moving up in his estimation.  As an example, at one point he refers to “brand-name foes like Georgia, Clemson and Florida State”.

Then there’s his discussion of this:

From a purely business standpoint, the most profitable move the biggest brand-name programs could make is to divorce themselves from the lower-tier brands in their own conferences that they are essentially subsidizing. Break off from the NCAA — in football only — and form a Premier League of sorts with the bluebloods from the other power conferences.

That culminates in this chart of what Mandel describes as “an exclusive league of the 24-32 most recognizable programs”.

realignment_cfb_premier_league

On the one hand, Georgia.  On the other… Tennessee?

Now, before you go there, I, like others, happen to think there are a lot of holes in the concept, but in terms of recognition, it looks like Mandel and Montana are warming up to that program in Athens.  All it took was moving from the Middle Ages to the Gilded Age to get there.

20 Comments

Filed under Georgia Football, Media Punditry/Foibles

20 responses to “Moving, to Montana

  1. Derek

    An English Premier league format where teams move in and out of the upper echelon based upon performance that allows for a NFL-type season and championship determination wouldn’t bother me a whole lot. We’re never expanding the playoff within the current format. Not that I’d mind if they stopped “improving” things either.

    Not playing tech simply because “we’re out of their league” has a certain perverse pleasure to it.

    Like

    • UGADrake

      I actually agree with Derek. As a Premier League fan, I do enjoy the idea of relegation. I think this inherently forces teams to build consistency from year to year to be “in the chase”. We already have that model now. Unfortunately, you are always going to have the top 8-12 schools that pick up the bottom 8-10 schools. And the top schools might want to break away to form a “Super League” (Premier League fights that off from time to time). Agreed, his illustration is very elementary, but it can work.

      Like

      • UGADrake

        Plus, consider the fact that you could play Tech in some sort of spring “non-league game.” Imagine the possibilities. I agree with Derek again, something nice about telling Tech they aren’t in our league.

        Like

  2. Biggus Rickus

    Oof. I think even I would have trouble watching college football anymore if they ever actually went to a pro-lite setup like that. I know people hate cupcake games for whatever reason, but I love them. While rare, the have-not beating the have is one of the best things about college football. Even just watching power programs struggle mightily with them is entertaining (like Tennessee-Charlotte last year or what our rivals’ fans probably experienced watching Georgia stumble around against Nicholls in 2016). I also enjoy a good bench-clearing blowout on occasion.

    Liked by 3 people

  3. Russ

    Yeah, I commented there that I have almost no interest in something like that. We already have a National Football League and the only time I watch that is when college football isn’t on. But unfortunately, I can see it coming. Luckily, I still have memories of what CFB used to be like. And soon, I’ll have more free time on Saturday afternoons.

    Like

  4. Arkansas? That almost reads like a typo.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Classic City Canine

      That’s what I thought too. If you include Arkansas, you’ve got to include pretty much everyone else besides the permanent cellar dwellers like Vanderbilt.

      Like

  5. Otto

    The Ole Miss and Miss. St should be in it before Tenn.

    Like

  6. 79Dawg

    I’m sure the pressures on players to be “majoring in football” won’t get ratcheted up some more once there is a promotion/relegation system in place…

    Like

  7. Union Jack

    Never gonna happen with just 28 – look at those schools on the list and then decide which fanbase is going to be happy as the Bournemouth, Southampton, Crystal Palace of college football?

    I could see it if added 14-28 more schools.

    Plus it’s all public schools save for Miami and Notre Dame.

    Like

  8. The Dawg Abides

    Where’s Georgia Tech? And what’s South Carolina doing in there?

    Like

  9. TimberRidgeDawg

    I don’t like the idea and could quibble about some of the teams but breaking them away from the NCAA would solve a lot of problems…. but at the expense of potentially destroying the athletic department budgets of those left behind. The monetary differences would likely impact the competitiveness of the non revenue sports left behind.

    I would expect the traditional conferences might want to tax the premier league schools to leave their non revenue sports parked in the traditional conferences but on the other hand, given the proposed teams, there are 9 SEC schoois and toss in Clemson, FSU, and Miami, you could realign all the sports into a new Southern Conference. At least that gets Mizzou out of the SEC East and no more trips to Starkville.

    You might as well go ahead and directly align them with the NFL as a minor league system while you’re at and put in a salary structure and cap.

    I don’t really think this works in the long term regardless if you start excluding the media markets of large swaths of the country and they tune out because their teams aren’t among the chosen.

    Like

    • 79Dawg

      It would “solve a bunch of problems” because the CPL would no longer be able to hide behind even the thinnest veneer of amateurism…

      Like

  10. Realignment has proven itself to be a money-grubbing chase that’s destroyed some of the classic rivalries of my youth, like Oklahoma-Nebraska, stretched conferences in absurd geographic attempts to add television markets regardless of the mediocrity they’re forced to absorb (well played, ACC and Big Ten) and created a scheduling mess in the SEC that the conference is still struggling with almost a decade later.

    The cognitive dissonance involved with actively believing players earning what they’re worth in a true free market is what kills college football as we know it while ignoring that college football as we know it has long been dead is what annoys me to no end in this discussion. There are no sacred cows in this business. Just pay the damn players.

    Like

  11. Haute Dawg

    Eastern Division:

    Florida
    Florida State
    Miami

    Looks like gerrymandering lives! All are further south than any of the Southern Division teams. Guess it’s OK to dis on North Carolina.

    Like

  12. TN Dawg

    I like this concept, I just think 40 teams is the number, not 28.

    9 division games and 1 game against a team from the other three divisions.

    Also relegation. The bottom team from each division gets relegated and replaced by a team from the lower level.

    That makes two 3-8 teams playing the last week of the season almost as interesting as top teams playing.

    Like

  13. Glenn mckanna Jr

    Would the rest of collage team’s play just as they were or would that be restructured.?

    Like

  14. West “By Gawd” Virginia !?!

    Like